Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melve, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Skjaerven, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melve, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Skjaerven, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2003;32:625-632
© International Epidemiological Association 2003


Perinatal Epidemiology

Birthweight and perinatal mortality: paradoxes, social class, and sibling dependencies

Kari Klungsøyr Melve1 and Rolv Skjaerven1,2

1 Section for Medical Statistics, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Norway.
2 Medical Birth Registry of Norway, University of Bergen, Norway.

Correspondence: Kari Klungsøyr Melve, Section for Medical Statistics, Armauer Hansens Building, N-5021 Bergen, Norway. E-mail: Kari.Melve{at}isf.uib.no

Background Birthweight distributions among second-born infants depend on the birthweights of older siblings, with implications for weight-specific perinatal mortality. We wanted to study whether these relations were explained by socioeconomic levels, and to study time trends in a situation with decreasing perinatal mortality rates.

Methods Births in the Norwegian Medical Birth Registry from 1967 to 1998 were linked to their mothers through their national identification numbers. The study population was 546 688 mothers with at least two singletons weighing >=500 g at birth. Weight-specific perinatal mortality for second-born siblings in families with first-born siblings in either the highest or the lowest birthweight quartile was analysed. Maternal education and cohabitation status were used as measures of socioeconomic level.

Results For all 500-g categories below 3500 g, mortality rates were significantly higher among second-born infants with an older sibling in the highest rather than the lowest weight quartile. This pattern was the same across three educational levels. The exclusion of preterm births did not change the effect pattern. A comparison of perinatal mortality among second siblings in terms of relative birthweight (z-scores) showed a reversal of the relative risks, although these were only significantly different from unity for the smallest infants.

Conclusion The crossover in weight-specific perinatal mortality for second siblings by weight of first sibling is largely independent of socioeconomic level, and is not weakened by the decreasing perinatal mortality rates in the population over time. Family data should be taken into consideration when evaluating the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome relating to weight.


Keywords Birthweight, gestational age, fetal death, infant mortality, sibling relations, socioeconomic factors, epidemiology

Accepted 19 February 2003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asia Pac J Public HealthHome page
R. Hong, V. Mishra, and J. Michael
Economic Disparity and Child Survival in Cambodia
Asia Pac J Public Health, June 1, 2007; 19(2): 37 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
A. J Wilcox
Commentary: On the paradoxes of birthweight
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2003; 32(4): 632 - 633.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.