Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brameld, K. J
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brameld, K. J
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2003;32:617-624
© International Epidemiological Association 2003


Theory and Methods

Improved methods for estimating incidence from linked hospital morbidity data

Kate J Brameld1, C D’arcy J Holman1, David M Lawrence1,2 and Michael ST Hobbs1

1 Department of Public Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009.
2 Current affiliation: TVW Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Western Australia.

Correspondence: Kate Brameld, Centre for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009. E-mail: kate{at}dph.uwa.edu.au

Background Linked hospital morbidity data can be used to estimate the incidence of serious chronic disease. However, incidence rates calculated from first-time hospital admissions tend to be overestimated as a result of the erroneous inclusion of prevalent cases that have had previous hospital admissions prior to the study observation period. To address this problem, we have developed the backcasting method.

Method A retrograde survival model was implemented to calculate the level of over-ascertainment of incidence according to the number of years of linked data on which the estimates were based and corresponding correction factors were calculated. The method is illustrated using the example of linked hospital morbidity data on diabetes mellitus and then acute myocardial infarction, which was validated against the Perth MONICA database for cardiovascular disease.

Results Corrected estimates of the incidence of diabetes and acute myocardial infarction were produced. The incidence of diabetes was shown to be lower than in North America in accordance with prevalence estimates, whereas the incidence of acute myocardial infarction was overestimated by approximately 10%.

Conclusion A new method is presented for estimating incidence trends in disease from linked hospital morbidity data. The advantages of this method are its ease of use with routinely collected data and the relatively low cost of applying it in comparison with community surveys or maintaining formal disease registers. The method has other applications using linked data, such as the study of trends in first-time health care procedures and pharmaceutical prescriptions.


Keywords Medical record linkage, incidence, diabetes mellitus, statistical models

Accepted 4 April 2003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
D. S Morrison
Homelessness as an independent risk factor for mortality: results from a retrospective cohort study
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2009; 38(3): 877 - 883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.