Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mannetje, A 't
Right arrow Articles by Kromhout, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mannetje, A 't
Right arrow Articles by Kromhout, H
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2003;32:419-428
© International Epidemiological Association 2003


Special Theme: Socio-economic position

The use of occupation and industry classifications in general population studies

A ‘t Mannetje1,2 and H Kromhout2

1 International Agency for Research on Cancer, Unit of Environmental Cancer Epidemiology, Lyon, France.
2 Utrecht University, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Environmental and Occupational Health Division, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Correspondence:
Andrea ‘t Mannetje, IARC, Unit of Environmental Cancer Epidemiology, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 79008 Lyon, France. E-mail:
mannetje{at}iarc.fr

Occupation and industry classifications are used in epidemiological studies to classify study subjects according to their job and subsequently to study risk by job, to infer social class indicators, or to infer exposure to specific agents through job-exposure matrices. However, documentation on methodological aspects concerning the use of occupation and industry classifications is sparse within epidemiology. This paper reviews the diverse applications of occupation and industry classifications in population-based epidemiological studies. The different classifications in use are discussed, and criteria are given for choosing a classification in an epidemiological study. Finally, the reliability of coding for occupation and industry is reviewed. A further standardization of the use of occupation and industry classifications in epidemiology is recommended, in order to facilitate future comparisons between studies and fully exploit their possibilities, especially when occupational exposures are to be inferred.


Keywords Standard classifications, job codes, industry codes, job-exposure matrices, social class, general population studies

Accepted 15 November 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
D. Consonni, S. De Matteis, J. H. Lubin, S. Wacholder, M. Tucker, A. C. Pesatori, N. E. Caporaso, P. A. Bertazzi, and M. T. Landi
Lung Cancer and Occupation in a Population-based Case-Control Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2010; 171(3): 323 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. A. MacDonald, A. Cohen, S. Baron, and C. M. Burchfiel
Occupation as Socioeconomic Status or Environmental Exposure? A Survey of Practice Among Population-based Cardiovascular Studies in the United States
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 15, 2009; 169(12): 1411 - 1421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
P J Quinlan, G Earnest, M D Eisner, E H Yelin, P P Katz, J R Balmes, and P D Blanc
Performance of self-reported occupational exposure compared to a job-exposure matrix approach in asthma and chronic rhinitis
Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2009; 66(3): 154 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
A Scarselli, A Binazzi, P Ferrante, and A Marinaccio
Occupational exposure levels to wood dust in Italy, 1996-2006
Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2008; 65(8): 567 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
G. G. Potter, M. J. Helms, and B. L. Plassman
Associations of job demands and intelligence with cognitive performance among men in late life
Neurology, May 6, 2008; 70(19_Part_2): 1803 - 1808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
W C Hadden, C Muntaner, J Benach, D Gimeno, and F G Benavides
A glossary for the social epidemiology of work organisation: Part 3, Terms from the sociology of labour markets
J Epidemiol Community Health, January 1, 2007; 61(1): 6 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
S. Dick, S. Semple, F. Dick, and A. Seaton
Occupational titles as risk factors for Parkinson's disease
Occup. Med., January 1, 2007; 57(1): 50 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
G. G. Potter, B. L. Plassman, M. J. Helms, S. M. Foster, and N. W. Edwards
Occupational characteristics and cognitive performance among elderly male twins
Neurology, October 24, 2006; 67(8): 1377 - 1382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
F G Benavides, J Benach, C Muntaner, G L Delclos, N Catot, and M Amable
Associations between temporary employment and occupational injury: what are the mechanisms?
Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2006; 63(6): 416 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
S J Hepworth, A Bolton, R C Parslow, M van Tongeren, K R Muir, and P A McKinney
Assigning exposure to pesticides and solvents from self-reports collected by a computer assisted personal interview and expert assessment of job codes: the UK Adult Brain Tumour Study.
Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2006; 63(4): 267 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. Shaw, H. Tunstall, and G. Davey Smith
Seeing social position: visualizing class in life and death
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2003; 32(3): 332 - 335.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. Kogevinas
Commentary: Standardized coding of occupational data in epidemiological studies
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2003; 32(3): 428 - 429.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.