Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tang, M.
Right arrow Articles by Krewski, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tang, M.
Right arrow Articles by Krewski, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2003;32:381-385
© International Epidemiological Association 2003


Special Theme: Socio-economic position

Gender-related differences in the association between socioeconomic status and self-reported diabetes

Mei Tang1,2, Yue Chen1 and Daniel Krewski1

1 Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and the McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
2 Ventana Clinical Research Corporation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Correspondence:
Yue Chen, Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5. E-mail:
ychen{at}uottawa.ca

Background The prevalence of diabetes has been steadily increasing in Western countries. We investigated the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on the prevalence of self-reported diabetes, and its differences between genders.

Methods Data for this investigation were derived from the second cycle of the National Population Health Survey conducted in 1996–1997. A total of 39 021 subjects (17 730 males and 21 291 females) >=40 years of age who answered the question about diabetes were included in the present analysis. Educational attainment and income adequacy were used as indicators of SES. Multiple logistic regression models were constructed for men and women separately to assess the effects of SES on the prevalence of diabetes after adjustment for age, area of residence, body mass index, and physical activity.

Results and The prevalence of diabetes was 6.6% among men and 5.5% among women. The

Conclusions prevalence increased with decreasing income category and educational attainment in both genders. The odds ratios for income and education in relation to diabetes after adjustment remained significant in women, but attained unity in men. Canadian women >=40 years of age of low SES have a relatively high prevalence of diabetes, independent of age, area of residence, obesity, and physical inactivity.


Keywords Body mass index, diabetes, education, income, prevalence, gender, self-reporting, sex, survey

Accepted 7 August 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
K. L. Chichlowska, K. M. Rose, A. V. Diez-Roux, S. H. Golden, A. M. McNeill, and G. Heiss
Individual and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status Characteristics and Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study
Psychosom Med, November 1, 2008; 70(9): 986 - 992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
N. Darmon and A. Drewnowski
Does social class predict diet quality?
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1107 - 1117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
L. N. Borrell, F. J. Dallo, and K. White
Education and Diabetes in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Population
Am J Public Health, September 1, 2006; 96(9): 1637 - 1642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
W. Rathmann, B. Haastert, A. Icks, G. Giani, R. Holle, C. Meisinger, A. Mielck, and The KORA Study Group
Sex differences in the associations of socioeconomic status with undiagnosed diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in the elderly population: the KORA Survey 2000
Eur J Public Health, December 1, 2005; 15(6): 627 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Drewnowski and N. Darmon
The economics of obesity: dietary energy density and energy cost
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2005; 82(1): 265S - 273S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. C. Thurston, L. D. Kubzansky, I. Kawachi, and L. F. Berkman
Is the Association between Socioeconomic Position and Coronary Heart Disease Stronger in Women than in Men?
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2005; 162(1): 57 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
G.P. Westert, F.G. Schellevis, D.H. de Bakker, P.P. Groenewegen, J.M. Bensing, and J. van der Zee
Monitoring health inequalities through general practice: the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice
Eur J Public Health, February 1, 2005; 15(1): 59 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
G. Alberti, P. Zimmet, J. Shaw, Z. Bloomgarden, F. Kaufman, and M. Silink
Type 2 Diabetes in the Young: The Evolving Epidemic: The International Diabetes Federation Consensus Workshop
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2004; 27(7): 1798 - 1811.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. A. Alter, K. Iron, P. C. Austin, and C. D. Naylor
Socioeconomic Status, Service Patterns, and Perceptions of Care Among Survivors of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Canada
JAMA, March 3, 2004; 291(9): 1100 - 1107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. Shaw, H. Tunstall, and G. Davey Smith
Seeing social position: visualizing class in life and death
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2003; 32(3): 332 - 335.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.