Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lagiou, P.
Right arrow Articles by Cnattingius, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lagiou, P.
Right arrow Articles by Cnattingius, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2003;32:193-198
© International Epidemiological Association 2003


Special Theme: Cancer

Birthweight differences between USA and China and their relevance to breast cancer aetiology

Pagona Lagiou1,2, Chung-Cheng Hsieh1,3, Dimitrios Trichopoulos1,2, Biao Xu4, Joanne Wuu3, Lorelei Mucci2, Rulla Tamimi2, Hans-Olov Adami2,5 and Sven Cnattingius5

1 Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Greece.
2 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
3 University of Massachusetts Cancer Center, Worcester, MA, USA.
4 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shanghai Medical University, Shanghai, China.
5 Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Correspondence: Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. E-mail: dtrichop{at}hsph.harvard.edu

Background There has been renewed interest about determinants of birth size following the propagation of hypotheses that birth size parameters may have long-term consequences on the occurrence of common diseases in adulthood, including breast cancer.

Methods In the context of a cohort study, 296 Caucasian pregnant women in Boston, USA and 329 Chinese pregnant women in Shanghai, China were followed to term. Birth size characteristics of the baby and maternal anthropometry were measured using standardized protocols. Analyses were conducted through multiple regression procedures.

Results No significant difference was found between US and Chinese newborns with respect to gestational age. Among US women, pregravid oral contraceptive use was strongly associated with higher birthweight. In both US and Chinese women, birthweight was positively associated with height, pre-pregnancy body mass index, and weight gain during pregnancy. More importantly, the difference in these three maternal variables between the two samples fully explains the birthweight difference between the two populations.

Conclusions We postulate that babies in China may have lower birthweight because their mothers’ anthropometry imposes constraints on the growth of the fetus. When Chinese women migrate to the US, they tend to grow taller and heavier so that their babies can reach, on the average, a higher birthweight. The recurrence of this process in successive generations could explain why eventually Chinese Americans tend to have comparable birth and adult anthropometric characteristics, as well as comparable breast cancer rates, to those of Caucasian Americans.


Keywords Birthweight, China, US, breast cancer

Accepted 13 June 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Xue, W. C. Willett, B. A. Rosner, M. R. Forman, and K. B. Michels
Parental characteristics as predictors of birthweight
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 168 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. M. Faupel-Badger, C.-C. Hsieh, R. Troisi, P. Lagiou, and N. Potischman
Plasma Volume Expansion in Pregnancy: Implications for Biomarkers in Population Studies
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1720 - 1723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. D. Smith
Epidemiological Freudianism
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2005; 34(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
T. Lam and G. Leung
Geoethnic-sensitive and cross-culture collaborative epidemiological studies
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2003; 32(2): 178 - 180.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. Okasha
Commentary: Inter-ethnic studies of breast cancer risk
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2003; 32(2): 198 - 199.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.