Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Int. J. Epidemiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (51)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wareham, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wareham, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2003;32:51-57
© International Epidemiological Association 2003


Special Theme: Genetic Epidemiology

The detection of gene–environment interaction for continuous traits: should we deal with measurement error by bigger studies or better measurement?

MY Wong1, NE Day2, JA Luan2, KP Chan1 and NJ Wareham2

1 Department of Mathematics, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Hong Kong.
2 University of Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK.

Correspondence: Dr Nicholas J Wareham, University of Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, UK. E-mail: njw1004{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk

Background The search for biologically relevant gene–environment interactions has been facilitated by technological advances in genotyping. The design of studies to detect interactions on continuous traits such as blood pressure and insulin sensitivity is attracting increasing attention. We have previously described power calculations for such studies, and this paper describes the extension of those calculations to take account of measurement error.

Methods The model considered in this paper is a simple linear regression relating a continuous outcome to a continuously distributed exposure variable in which the ratio of slopes for each genotype is considered as the interaction parameter. The classical measurement error model is used to describe the uncertainty in measurement in the outcome and the exposure. The sample size to detect differing magnitudes of interaction with varying frequencies of the minor allele are calculated for a given main effect observed with error both in the exposure and the outcome. The sample size to detect a given interaction for a given minor allele frequency is calculated for differing degrees of measurement error in the assessment of the exposure and the outcome.

Results The required sample size is dependent upon the magnitude of the interaction, the allele frequency and the strength of the association in those with the common allele. As an example, we take the situation in which the effect size in those with the common allele was a quarter of a standard deviation change in the outcome for a standard deviation change in the exposure. If a minor allele with a frequency of 20% leads to a doubling of that effect size, then the sample size is highly dependent upon the precision with which the exposure and outcome are measured. {rho}Tx and {rho}Ty are the correlation between the measured exposure and outcome, respectively and the true value. If poor measures of the exposure and outcome are used, (e.g. {rho}Tx = 0.3, {rho}Ty = 0.4), then a study size of 150 989 people would be required to detect the interaction with 95% power at a significance level of 10-4. Such an interaction could be detected in study samples of under 10 000 people if more precise measurements of exposure and outcome were made (e.g. {rho}Tx = 0.7, {rho}Ty = 0.7), and possibly in samples of under 5000 if the precision of estimation were enhanced by taking repeated measurements.

Conclusions The formulae for calculating the sample size required to study the interaction between a continuous exposure and a genetic factor on a continuous outcome variable in the face of measurement error will be of considerable utility in designing studies with appropriate power. These calculations suggest that smaller studies with repeated and more precise measurement of the exposure and outcome will be as powerful as studies even 20 times bigger, which necessarily employ less precise measures because of their size. Even though the cost of genotyping is falling, the magnitude of the effect of measurement error on the power to detect interaction on continuous traits suggests that investment in studies with better measurement may be a more appropriate strategy than attempting to deal with error by increasing sample sizes.


Keywords Environmental exposure, gene-environment interaction, genotype, quantitative trait, sample size

Accepted 18 February 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Int. J. Epidemiol.:

Rates and states: reflections on the health of nations
John Lynch and George Davey Smith
Int. J. Epidemiol. 2003 32: 663-670. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
K. Corder, D. Ogilvie, and E. M. F. van Sluijs
Invited Commentary: Physical Activity Over the Life Course--Whose Behavior Changes, When, and Why?
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2009; 170(9): 1078 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. S Vimaleswaran, S. Li, J. H. Zhao, J. Luan, S. A Bingham, K.-T. Khaw, U. Ekelund, N. J Wareham, and R. J. Loos
Physical activity attenuates the body mass index-increasing influence of genetic variation in the FTO gene
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2009; 90(2): 425 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
I Burstyn, H-M Kim, Y Yasui, and N M Cherry
The virtues of a deliberately mis-specified disease model in demonstrating a gene-environment interaction
Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2009; 66(6): 374 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
P Founti, F Topouzis, L van Koolwijk, C E Traverso, N Pfeiffer, and A C Viswanathan
Biobanks and the importance of detailed phenotyping: a case study--the European Glaucoma Society GlaucoGENE project
Br J Ophthalmol, May 1, 2009; 93(5): 577 - 581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
P. R Burton, A. L Hansell, I. Fortier, T. A Manolio, M. J Khoury, J. Little, and P. Elliott
Size matters: just how big is BIG?: Quantifying realistic sample size requirements for human genome epidemiology
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2009; 38(1): 263 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
J. van Os, B. P. Rutten, and R. Poulton
Gene-Environment Interactions in Schizophrenia: Review of Epidemiological Findings and Future Directions
Schizophr Bull, November 1, 2008; 34(6): 1066 - 1082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
M. I. McCarthy and J. N. Hirschhorn
Genome-wide association studies: potential next steps on a genetic journey
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2008; 17(R2): R156 - R165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. M. Steele, S. Brage, K. Corder, N. J. Wareham, and U. Ekelund
Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and the metabolic syndrome in youth
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2008; 105(1): 342 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. J. Delfino
Who are the children with asthma most susceptible to air pollution?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2006; 173(10): 1054 - 1055.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
N. Tasevska, S. A. Runswick, and S. A. Bingham
Urinary Potassium Is as Reliable as Urinary Nitrogen for Use as a Recovery Biomarker in Dietary Studies of Free Living Individuals
J. Nutr., May 1, 2006; 136(5): 1334 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Perspectives on Psychological ScienceHome page
T. E. Moffitt, A. Caspi, and M. Rutter
Measured Gene-Environment Interactions in Psychopathology: Concepts, Research Strategies, and Implications for Research, Intervention, and Public Understanding of Genetics
Perspectives on Psychological Science, March 1, 2006; 1(1): 5 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J.-Y. Park, R. E. Ferrell, J.-J. Park, J. M. Hagberg, D. A. Phares, J. M. Jones, and M. D. Brown
NADPH oxidase p22phox gene variants are associated with systemic oxidative stress biomarker responses to exercise training
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2005; 99(5): 1905 - 1911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
P. Kraft and D. Hunter
Integrating epidemiology and genetic association: the challenge of gene-environment interaction
Phil Trans R Soc B, August 29, 2005; 360(1460): 1609 - 1616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
T. E. Moffitt, A. Caspi, and M. Rutter
Strategy for Investigating Interactions Between Measured Genes and Measured Environments
Arch Gen Psychiatry, May 1, 2005; 62(5): 473 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
P. W. Franks, S. Bhattacharyya, J.'a. Luan, C. Montague, J. Brennand, B. Challis, S. Brage, U. Ekelund, R. P.S. Middelberg, S. O'Rahilly, et al.
Association Between Physical Activity and Blood Pressure Is Modified by Variants in the G-Protein Coupled Receptor 10
Hypertension, February 1, 2004; 43(2): 224 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
A. Phillips
Commentary: Balancing quantity and quality when designing epidemiological studies
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2003; 32(1): 58 - 59.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.