Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mbulaiteye, S M
Right arrow Articles by Whitworth, J A G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mbulaiteye, S M
Right arrow Articles by Whitworth, J A G
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31:961-967
© International Epidemiological Association 2002


Special Theme: Infectious Diseases

Generalizability of population-based studies on AIDS: a comparison of newly and continuously surveyed villages in rural southwest Uganda

S M Mbulaiteyea,b, C Mahea,c, A Ruberantwaria and J A G Whitwortha

a Medical Research Council Programme on AIDS/Uganda Virus Research Institute, PO Box 49, Entebbe, Uganda. E-mail: mrc{at}starcom.co.ug
b Current affiliation: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
c Current affiliation: Unit of Descriptive Epidemiology, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.

Dr SM Mbulaiteye, 6120 Executive Blvd, EPS Rm.8007 MSC 7248, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. E-mail: mbulaits{at}mail.nih.gov

Abstract

Background Population-based studies are thought to provide generalizable epidemiological data on the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) epidemic. However, longitudinal studies are susceptible to bias from added attention caused by study activities. We compare HIV-1 prevalence in previously and newly surveyed villages in rural southwest Uganda.

Methods The study population resided in 25 neighbouring villages, of which 15 have been surveyed for 10 years. Respondents (>=13 years) provided socio-demographic and sexual behaviour data and a blood sample for HIV-1 serology in private after informed consent. We tested the independent effect of residency: (1) original versus new villages; (2) proximity to main road; and (3) proximity to trading centre on HIV-1 serostatus of respondents using multivariate logistic regression.

Results There were 8990 adults censused, 68.3% were from the original villages, 48.2% were males and 6111 (68.0%) were interviewed and had definite HIV-1 serostatus. The HIV-1 prevalence was 6.1% overall, 5.7% in the new, and 6.4% in the original villages (P = 0.25). Residency in the new or original villages did not independently predict HIV-1 serostatus of respondents (P = 0.46). Independent predictors of HIV-1 serostatus were education (primary or higher, odds ratio [OR] = 1.7 and 1.4, respectively), being separated or widowed OR = 4.2, reported previous use of a condom OR = 1.8, or reported genital ulceration OR = 3.3, and age group 25–34 and 35–44 years OR = 5.8 and OR = 4.8 (all P <= 0.001).

Conclusions In the context of rural Uganda where there has been considerable health education about AIDS, the additional attention to HIV infection caused by this longitudinal study does not appear to have appreciably affected the prevalence of HIV-1 infection.

Keywords Epidemiology, AIDS, Africa, Hawthorne effect, HIV-1, Uganda

Accepted 26 April 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.