International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31:1021-1027
© International Epidemiological Association 2002
Cancer |
Geographical differences in cancer incidence in the Amazon basin of Ecuador in relation to residence near oil fields
Instituto de Epidemiología y Salud Comunitaria Manuel Amunárriz, Apdo. 17-10-7410, Quito, Ecuador. E-mail: sandyura{at}ecuanex.net.ec
Abstract
Background Since 1972, oil companies have extracted more than 2 billion barrels of crude oil from the Ecuadorian Amazon, releasing billions of gallons of untreated wastes and oil directly into the environment. This study aimed to determine if there was any difference in overall and specific cancer incidence rates between populations living in proximity to oil fields and those who live in areas free from oil exploitation.
Methods Cancer cases from the provinces of Sucumbios, Orellana, Napo and Pastaza during the period 19851998 were included in the study. The exposed population was defined as those living in a county (n = 4) where oil exploitation had been ongoing for a minimum of 20 years up to the date of the study. Non-exposed counties were identified as those (n = 11) without oil development activities. Relative risks (RR) along with 95% CI were calculated for men and women as ratios of the age-adjusted incidence rates in the exposed versus non-exposed group.
Results The RR of all cancer sites combined was significantly elevated in both men and women in exposed counties. Significantly elevated RR were observed for cancers of the stomach, rectum, skin melanoma, soft tissue and kidney in men and for cancers of the cervix and lymph nodes in women. An increase in haematopoietic cancers was also observed in the population under 10 years in the exposed counties in both males and females.
Conclusion Study results are compatible with a relationship between cancer incidence and living in proximity to oil fields. An environmental monitoring and cancer surveillance system in the area is recommended.
Keywords Crude oil, cancer, Amazon, Ecuador
Accepted 20 November 2001
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Widener Oil Conflict in Ecuador: A Photographic Essay Organization Environment, March 1, 2007; 20(1): 84 - 105. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. HARARI and H. HARARI Children's Environment and Health in Latin America: The Ecuadorian Case. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., September 1, 2006; 1076: 660 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hurtig and M S. Sebastian Epidemiology vs epidemiology: the case of oil exploitation in the Amazon basin of Ecuador Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 34(5): 1170 - 1172. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Terracini Development of environmental epidemiology in Latin America: scope, methodological issues, priorities Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2005; 34(2): 485 - 487. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-K. Hurtig, M. San Sebastian, and J. Siemiatycki Epidemiology on the side of the angels ... or the people? Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2003; 32(4): 658 - 659. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Siemiatycki Commentary: Epidemiology on the side of the angels Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2002; 31(5): 1027 - 1029. [Full Text] |
||||


