Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brenner, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hakulinen, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brenner, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hakulinen, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31:456-462
© International Epidemiological Association 2002


Theory and Method

Use of period analysis for providing more up-to-date estimates of long-term survival rates: empirical evaluation among 370 000 cancer patients in Finland

Hermann Brennera, Bengt Södermanb and Timo Hakulinenb,c

a Department of Epidemiology, German Centre for Research on Ageing, Heidelberg, Germany.
b Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland.
c Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Finland.

Prof. Dr Hermann Brenner, Department of Epidemiology, German Centre for Research on Ageing, Bergheimer Strasse 20, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail: brenner{at}dzfa.uni-heidelberg.de

Abstract

Background Providing up-to-date estimates of cancer patient survival rates is an important task of cancer registries. A few years ago, a new method of survival analysis, denoted period analysis, was proposed to enhance the recency of long-term survival estimates. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive empirical evaluation of the use of this method.

Methods Using data from the nationwide Finnish Cancer Registry, we compare 5-year and 10-year relative survival rates of 371 849 patients diagnosed with one of the 16 most common forms of cancer in Finland at various time intervals between 1953 and 1992 with the most up-to-date estimates of 5-year or 10-year relative survival that might have been obtained in those time intervals by traditional methods of survival analysis and by period analysis of survival.

Results Survival rates strongly increased over time for most forms of cancer. For these cancers, traditional estimates of 5- and 10-year survival rates would have severely lagged behind the survival rates later observed for newly diagnosed patients, and period analysis would consistently have provided much more up-to-date estimates of survival rates.

Conclusions We conclude that period analysis should be implemented as a standard tool for providing up-to-date estimates of long-term survival rates by cancer registries.

Keywords Cancer registry, statistical methods, survival

Accepted 24 September 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
H. Brenner, A. Gondos, and D. Pulte
Trends in long-term survival of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia from the 1980s to the early 21st century
Blood, May 15, 2008; 111(10): 4916 - 4921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
haematolHome page
D. Pulte, A. Gondos, and H. Brenner
Improvements in survival of adults diagnosed with acute myeloblastic leukemia in the early 21st century
Haematologica, April 1, 2008; 93(4): 594 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
H. Brenner, A. Gondos, and D. Pulte
Ongoing improvement in long-term survival of patients with Hodgkin disease at all ages and recent catch-up of older patients
Blood, March 15, 2008; 111(6): 2977 - 2983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
D. Pulte, A. Gondos, and H. Brenner
Ongoing Improvement in Outcomes for Patients Diagnosed as Having Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma From the 1990s to the Early 21st Century
Arch Intern Med, March 10, 2008; 168(5): 469 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
H. Brenner, A. Gondos, and D. Pulte
Recent major improvement in long-term survival of younger patients with multiple myeloma
Blood, March 1, 2008; 111(5): 2521 - 2526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
E Steliarova-Foucher, V Arndt, D. Parkin, F Berrino, and H Brenner
Timely disclosure of progress in childhood cancer survival by 'period' analysis in the Automated Childhood Cancer Information System
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2007; 18(9): 1554 - 1560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. Brenner and T. Hakulinen
Maximizing the Benefits of Model-Based Period Analysis of Cancer Patient Survival
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2007; 16(8): 1675 - 1681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H. Brenner, A. Gondos, and V. Arndt
Recent Major Progress in Long-Term Cancer Patient Survival Disclosed by Modeled Period Analysis
J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2007; 25(22): 3274 - 3280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A Gondos, B Holleczek, V Arndt, C Stegmaier, H Ziegler, and H Brenner
Trends in population-based cancer survival in Germany: to what extent does progress reach older patients?
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2007; 18(7): 1253 - 1259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
E de Vries, S Houterman, M. Janssen-Heijnen, T Nijsten, S. van de Schans, A. Eggermont, and J. Coebergh
Up-to-date survival estimates and historical trends of cutaneous malignant melanoma in the south-east of The Netherlands
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2007; 18(6): 1110 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
H. Brenner and T. Hakulinen
Up-to-date and Precise Estimates of Cancer Patient Survival: Model-based Period Analysis
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2006; 164(7): 689 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. Brenner and T. Hakulinen
Up-to-Date Estimates of Cancer Patient Survival Even with Common Latency in Cancer Registration.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2006; 15(9): 1727 - 1732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. Houterman, M. L. G. Janssen-Heijnen, L. V. van de Poll-Franse, H. Brenner, and J. W. W. Coebergh
Higher long-term cancer survival rates in southeastern Netherlands using up-to-date period analysis
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2006; 17(4): 709 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. Brenner and V. Arndt
Further Enhanced Monitoring of Cancer Patient Survival by Stage-Adjusted Period Analysis
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2005; 14(8): 1917 - 1921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
H. Brenner, C. Stegmaier, and H. Ziegler
Long-term survival of cancer patients in Germany achieved by the beginning of the third millenium
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2005; 16(6): 981 - 986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.