Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saphonn, V.
Right arrow Articles by Detels, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saphonn, V.
Right arrow Articles by Detels, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31:449-455
© International Epidemiological Association 2002


Theory and Method

How well do antenatal clinic (ANC) attendees represent the general population? A comparison of HIV prevalence from ANC sentinel surveillance sites with a population-based survey of women aged 15–49 in Cambodia

Vonthanak Saphonna,c, Leng Bun Hora, Sun Penh Lya, Samrith Chhuona, Tobi Saidelb and Roger Detelsc

a National Center for HIV/AIDS, Dermatology and STD, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
b Family Health International/Regional office/Bangkok, Thailand.
c Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Roger Detels, University of California, Los Angeles, Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1772, USA. E-mail: detels{at}ucla.edu

Abstract

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether HIV-1 prevalence among antenatal clinic (ANC) attendees in Cambodia provided a reasonable estimate of HIV-1 prevalence among all women 15–49 years.

Methods Antenatal clinic attendees in five HIV sentinel surveillance sites (five provinces) were selected by consecutive sampling (n = 1695). The population survey of females by household was carried out in the same five areas. Household females aged 15–49 years were selected using a three-stage cluster sampling design (n = 3066). Serum-based HIV ELISA testing was done for both ANC attendees and household females. The HIV prevalence for ANC attendees and household females were compared by age group and urban versus rural location.

Results The overall prevalence of HIV-1 infection among ANC attendees (1.62%, 95% CI : 1.26–1.98) was similar to the overall prevalence obtained from the general population of household females (1.24%, 95% CI : 0.92–1.55) in the same catchment areas in Cambodia. In the rural areas, the overall HIV prevalence among ANC attendees (2.18%, 95% CI : 1.59–2.77) was significantly higher than among the household females (0.86%, 95% CI : 0.49–1.23) after adjustment for age distribution and education level. In the 15–24 age group in rural areas, the HIV prevalence of ANC women was 2.71% (95% CI : 0.96–4.46) compared with 0.77% (95% CI : 0.02–1.53) in household females.

Conclusions Although ANC data can be used to estimate trends over time, it should be realized that ANC data may overestimate the actual prevalence in the younger age group in rural areas in Cambodia.

Keywords Cambodia, HIV, prevalence, sentinel surveillance, population survey

Accepted 3 October 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.