Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischbach, L. A
Right arrow Articles by Aragaki, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fischbach, L. A
Right arrow Articles by Aragaki, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2002;31:128-139
© International Epidemiological Association 2002


Special Theme: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis

Sources of variation of Helicobacter pylori treatment success in adults worldwide: a meta-analysis

Lori A Fischbacha, Karen J Goodmanb, Mark Feldmanc and Corinne Aragakia

a School of Public Health at Dallas, University of Texas—Houston, Health Science Center.
b School of Public Health, University of Texas—Houston, Health Science Center.
c Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas and The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas.

Lori Ann Fischbach, MPH Program at UT Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, V8.112, Dallas, TX 75390–9128, USA. E-mail: Lori.Fischbach{at}UTSouthwestern.edu

Abstract

Background A vast number of Helicobacter pylori treatment trials have been conducted. Regimens may vary in efficacy in different patient populations.

Methods We identified sources of treatment effect variation from 618 treatment groups using weighted cross-classified multi-level meta-regression models. Summary effect estimates were calculated within groups that lacked identified heterogeneity.

Results Overall, treatment was less successful with shorter treatment duration and dual drug (versus triple or quadruple drug) therapies. For nitroimidazole-based regimens, treatment was less successful in populations with frequent childhood H. pylori infection or metronidazole resistance and more successful in northeastern Asia. Non-nitroimidazole treatments of longer duration and those from less recent reports were most successful. Some one-week regimens—(nitroimidazole/ tetracycline/bismuth, ranitidine bismuth citrate/amoxicillin/clarithromycin, and clarithromycin/amoxicillin/proton pump inhibitor) were highly successful in northeastern Asia regardless of metronidazole resistance. The most successful regimen in populations with both a high prevalence of metrondiazole resistance and frequent infection in children (metronidazole/furazolidone/amoxicillin) eliminated fewer than 70% of infections.

Conclusions More effective treatments are needed for most populations of the world where H. pylori infection in children and drug resistance are common. Current treatment guidelines do not coincide with the best treatment regimens identified in this meta-analysis.

Keywords Helicobacter pylori, meta-analysis, review, treatments, drug resistance, prevalence, world health, review

Accepted 5 October 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
D. Dailidiene, M. T. Bertoli, J. Miciuleviciene, A. K. Mukhopadhyay, G. Dailide, M. A. Pascasio, L. Kupcinskas, and D. E. Berg
Emergence of Tetracycline Resistance in Helicobacter pylori: Multiple Mutational Changes in 16S Ribosomal DNA and Other Genetic Loci
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., December 1, 2002; 46(12): 3940 - 3946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. Egger, S. Ebrahim, and G. D. Smith
Where now for meta-analysis?
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2002; 31(1): 1 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.