International Journal of Epidemiology 2001;30:1017-1020
© International Epidemiological Association 2001
Infectious Disease |
Nipah virus infection among abattoir workers in Malaysia, 19981999
a Institute for Medical Research (IMR), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
b Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases (DVRD), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA.
c Centre for Disease Control, Ministry of Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
d Negeri Sembilan Health Department, Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
e Department of Veterinary Services (DVS), Ministry of Agriculture, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
f Members of the Nipah Encephalitis Outbreak Investigation Group: AB Suleiman, AS Tee (Ministry of Health, Malaysia); MA Rahman (DVS, Ministry of Agriculture, Malaysia); F Ong, OC Huck (Sarawak Health Department, Sarawak, Malaysia); D Cannon, P Stockton, L Anderson (DVRD, CDC, Atlanta, GA); WRW Mahiyuddin and ZM Noor (IMR, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia).
Dr Lye Munn Sunn, Institute for Medical Research, Jalan Pahang, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. E-mail: lyems{at}imr.gov.my
Abstract
Background An outbreak of encephalitis primarily affecting pig farmers occurred during 19981999 in Malaysia and was linked to a new paramyxovirus, Nipah virus, which infected pigs, humans, dogs, and cats. Because five abattoir workers were also affected, a survey was conducted to assess the risk of Nipah infection among abattoir workers.
Methods Workers from all 143 registered abattoirs in 11 of 13 states in Malaysia were invited to participate in this cross-sectional study. Participants were interviewed to ascertain information on illness and activities performed at the abattoir. A serum sample was obtained to test for Nipah virus antibody.
Results Seven (1.6 %) of 435 abattoir workers who slaughtered pigs versus zero (0%) of 233 workers who slaughtered ruminants showed antibody to Nipah virus (P = 0.05). All antibody-positive workers were from abattoirs in the three states that reported outbreak cases among pig farmers. Workers in these three states were more likely than those in other states to have Nipah antibody (7/144 [4.86%] versus 0/291 [0%], P < 0.001) and report symptoms suggestive of Nipah disease in pigs admitted to the abattoirs (P = 0.001).
Conclusions Nipah infection was not widespread among abattoir workers in Malaysia and was linked to exposure to pigs. Since it may be difficult to identify Nipah-infected pigs capable of transmitting virus by clinical symptoms, using personal protective equipment, conducting surveillance for Nipah infection on pig farms which supply abattoirs, and avoiding handling and processing of potentially infected pigs are presently the best strategies to prevent transmission of Nipah virus in abattoirs.
Keywords Nipah virus, abattoir workers, Malaysia
Accepted 22 December 2000
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. T. Wong, W.-J. Shieh, S. Kumar, K. Norain, W. Abdullah, J. Guarner, C. S. Goldsmith, K. B. Chua, S. K. Lam, C. T. Tan, et al. Nipah Virus Infection: Pathology and Pathogenesis of an Emerging Paramyxoviral Zoonosis Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2002; 161(6): 2153 - 2167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Bellini Commentary: Paramyxoviruses, pigs and abattoirs Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2001; 30(5): 1020 - 1021. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

