Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boulle, A.
Right arrow Articles by Weller, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boulle, A.
Right arrow Articles by Weller, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2001;30:515-520
© International Epidemiological Association 2001


Theory and Methods

A case study of using artificial neural networks for classifying cause of death from verbal autopsy

Andrew Boullea, Daniel Chandramohana and Peter Wellerb

b Centre for Measurement and Informatics in Medicine, City University, London, UK.

Daniel Chandramohan, Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK. E-mail: D.chandramohan{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Abstract

Background Artificial neural networks (ANN) are gaining prominence as a method of classification in a wide range of disciplines. In this study ANN is applied to data from a verbal autopsy study as a means of classifying cause of death.

Methods A simulated ANN was trained on a subset of verbal autopsy data, and the performance was tested on the remaining data. The performance of the ANN models were compared to two other classification methods (physician review and logistic regression) which have been tested on the same verbal autopsy data.

Results Artificial neural network models were as accurate as or better than the other techniques in estimating the cause-specific mortality fraction (CSMF). They estimated the CSMF within 10% of true value in 8 out of 16 causes of death. Their sensitivity and specificity compared favourably with that of data-derived algorithms based on logistic regression models.

Conclusions Cross-validation is crucial in preventing the over-fitting of the ANN models to the training data. Artificial neural network models are a potentially useful technique for classifying causes of death from verbal autopsies. Large training data sets are needed to improve the performance of data-derived algorithms, in particular ANN models.

KEY MESSAGES

  • Artifical neural networks have potential for classifying causes of death from verbal autopsies.
  • Large datasets are needed to train neural networks and for validating their performance.
  • Generalizability of neural network models to various settings needs further evaluation.

Keywords Verbal autopsies, classification, neural networks

Accepted 10 January 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
P. Byass, Dao Lan Huong, and Hoang Van Minh
A probabilistic approach to interpreting verbal autopsies: methodology and preliminary validation in Vietnam
Scand J Public Health, December 1, 2003; 31(6_suppl): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
P. Byass, Dao Lan Huong, and Hoang Van Minh
A probabilistic approach to interpreting verbal autopsies: methodology and preliminary validation in Vietnam
Scand J Public Health, January 1, 2003; 31(1): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.