International Journal of Epidemiology 2001;30:264-267
© International Epidemiological Association 2001
Special Theme: Socioeconomic Differentials in Health |
Educational differences in lung cancer mortality in male smokers
a Population Research Unit, Department of Sociology, PO Box 18, FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland.
b International Centre for Health and Society, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1–19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
c Department of Public Health, PO Box 41, FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland.
d Rolf Nevanlinna Institute, PO Box 4, FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland.
e Cancer Prevention Studies Branch, Division of Clinical Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
f National Public Health Institute, Department of Nutrition, Mannerheimintie 166, FIN-00300, Helsinki, Finland.
Reprint requests to: Pekka Martikainen, International Centre for Health and Society, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1–19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK. E-mail pekka{at}public-health.ucl.ac.uk
Abstract
Background To assess the extent of lung cancer mortality differentials by education while adjusting for exposure to tobacco smoke and asbestos based on survey questions.
Methods Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study of 50–69-year-old Finnish male smokers enrolled 1985–1988. These analyses are based on the placebo group and the alpha-tocopherol supplementation group, altogether 14 011 men, with full information on tobacco smoking. Mortality follow-up was to the end of April 1993 and it was based on the complete death certificate register of the Statistics Finland.
Results Lung cancer mortality of basic-educated men was 32% (rate ratio [RR] = 1.32; 95% CI : 0.93–1.87) higher than that of better-educated men in the ATBC Study. The excess is practically unchanged when additional adjustment was made for age at initiation, duration of smoking, current smoking at baseline and at first follow-up, smoke inhalation, occupational exposure to asbestos and interactions between asbestos exposure and all smoking variables. This excess mortality was about 40% of the similar excess observed in the general population of men of similar age.
Conclusions Educational differences in lung cancer mortality in the total Finnish population are likely to be mainly caused by differences in exposure, particularly to active smoking. Further understanding of the determinants and consequences of socioeconomic differences in smoking behaviour are of major scientific and public health importance.
Keywords Lung cancer, mortality, education, smoking, confounding
Accepted 7 February 2000
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. Menvielle, H. Boshuizen, A. E. Kunst, S. O. Dalton, P. Vineis, M. M. Bergmann, S. Hermann, P. Ferrari, O. Raaschou-Nielsen, A. Tjonneland, et al. The Role of Smoking and Diet in Explaining Educational Inequalities in Lung Cancer Incidence J Natl Cancer Inst, March 4, 2009; 101(5): 321 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Shohaimi, A. Welch, S. Bingham, R. Luben, N. Day, N. Wareham, and K-T. Khaw Area deprivation predicts lung function independently of education and social class Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2004; 24(1): 157 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S Shohaimi, R Luben, N Wareham, N Day, S Bingham, A Welch, S Oakes, and K-T Khaw Residential area deprivation predicts smoking habit independently of individual educational level and occupational social class. A cross sectional study in the Norfolk cohort of the European Investigation into Cancer (EPIC-Norfolk) J Epidemiol Community Health, April 1, 2003; 57(4): 270 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Blane Commentary: Socioeconomic health differentials Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2001; 30(2): 292 - 293. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M Najman Commentary: General or cause-specific factors in explanations of class inequalities in health Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2001; 30(2): 296 - 297. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|