Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neeleman, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neeleman, J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2001;30:154-162
© International Epidemiological Association 2001


Mental Health

A continuum of premature death. Meta-analysis of competing mortality in the psychosocially vulnerable

J Neeleman

Department of Social Psychiatry, University of Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands. E-mail: j.neeleman{at}med.rug.nl

Abstract

Background Suicide may be an extreme expression of liability to death of any type. If true, suicide risk factors should also increase other mortality, and, given exposure, excess risk should be higher for suicide than for other mortality.

Methods Of 304 publications identified in Index Medicus (1966–June 1988) by the string (suicide) and (mortality or death) and (accidental or natural), 24 reported total and cause-specific mortality associated with exposure to 16 established suicide risk factors; reference scanning yielded 122 more. These 146 publications reported on 163 cohorts (total subjects = 1179 126) mortality. Meta-analysis gave random effects standardized mortality ratios (SMR) for natural, accidental and suicidal death, stratified over the 16 risk groups.

Results Overall, SMR were 8.6 (95% CI : 7.1–10.4) for suicide, 3.4 (95% CI : 2.9–4.0) for accidental and 2.1 (95% CI : 1.9–2.3) for natural death. Compatible with the first hypothesis, in most groups, mortality of any type was raised. Supporting the second hypothesis, excesses increased from lowest for natural death to highest for suicide. This trend was most pronounced following deliberate self-harm, intermediate in substance abusers, and weakest, but present, in bereaved and low social class cohorts and reversed in smokers and epileptic people.

Conclusions Many suicide risks apply to any type of premature death, whilst also retaining some specificity for suicide. Primary prevention, targeting such generic risk factors, will not only reduce rates of suicide but also of other types of death. Conversely, when prevention focuses on specific outcomes—such as suicide—only, other types of mortality may increase.

Keywords Suicide, accidental death, natural death, meta-analysis

Accepted 11 January 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
L. L Citrome and A. B Jaffe
Relationship of Atypical Antipsychotics with Development of Diabetes Mellitus
Ann. Pharmacother., December 1, 2003; 37(12): 1849 - 1857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
J. Neeleman, J. Ormel, and R. V. Bijl
The Distribution of Psychiatric and Somatic Ill Health: Associations With Personality and Socioeconomic Status
Psychosom Med, March 1, 2001; 63(2): 239 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.