Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROGHMANN, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by HAGGERTY, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ROGHMANN, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by HAGGERTY, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1974 Oxford University Press

research-article

Measuring the Use of Health Services by Household Interviews: A Comparison of Procedures Used in Three Child Health Surveys*

KLAUS J. ROGHMANN1, and ROBERT J. HAGGERTY2

1 2Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester, School of Medicine and Dentistry 1545 Mt. Hope Avenue, Rochester, New York 14620, U.S.A.

Reprint requests should be addressed to Dr. K. J. Roghmann.

Four different survey methods for estimating the volume of physician visits in a child population were employed in three different surveys: the standard 2-week-frequency recall question, a supplementary 12-month-frequency recall question, a 4-week health calendar and a telephone follow-up interview. Comparison of the various estimates with each other and known figures about the actual supply of services permitted an assessment of their overall error. For selected cases a validity check against medical records and insurance payment files was possible. Though these checks rarely permitted study designs that would detect under-reporting and over-reporting equally well, or that would permit generalizations for all patients or providers, they gave insights in the amount and type of error involved.

The health calendar provided the best utilization data, but at high costs. As the most efficient procedure, especially for small community surveys, we recommend a combined use of the standard 2-week question with a supplementary 12-month question. The telephone follow-up covering about 12 months had the highest error. A combination of household surveys, provider statistics and selected validity checks has in our view the greatest payoff for monitoring a health services market to aid regional planning.

Received 29 June 1973


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Mixed Methods ResearchHome page
K. M. Yount and J. Gittelsohn
Comparing Reports of Health-Seeking Behavior From the Integrated Illness History and a Standard Child Morbidity Survey
Journal of Mixed Methods Research, January 1, 2008; 2(1): 23 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.