Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stigum, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nord, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stigum, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nord, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2000;29:1076-1084
© International Epidemiological Association 2000

Human T-cell lymphotropic virus testing of blood donors in Norway: a cost-effect model

Hein Stiguma, Per Magnusa, Helvi Holm Samdalb and Erik Norda

a Department of Population Health Sciences,
b Department of Virology, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Reprint requests: Hein Stigum, Department of Population Health Sciences, National Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404 Torshov, 0403 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: Hein.Stigum{at}Folkehelsa.no

Background Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I and II (HTLV-I and II) are human retroviruses that can be transmitted by transfusion of whole blood. An HTLV-I infection is associated with adult T-cell leukaemia (ATL) and with tropical spastic paraparesis (TSP). Antibody tests from 5.5 million European blood donors have shown that the HTLV prevalence is low, ranging from 0 to 0.02%. This paper examines costs and effects associated with the intervention of testing all new blood donors for HTLV.

Methods A mathematical model was used to calculate the number of cases prevented by the intervention. For a given prevalence of HTLV in the blood donor population, the model calculates the number of recipients infected by transfusion, and the number of partners and offspring that will in turn be infected. The model then calculates the number of subjects with disease due to HTLV-I infection and the number of deaths from disease. From these numbers the measures of cost and effect are calculated.

Results Testing all new blood donors for HTLV is calculated to cost US$ 9.2 million per life saved, or US$ 420 000 per quality adjusted life year gained by the intervention, when the HTLV prevalence among donors is 1 per 100 000. When the prevalence among donors is 10 per 100 000 the intervention will cost US$ 0.9 million per life saved, or US$ 41 000 per quality adjusted life year gained. The same analysis shows that testing blood donors for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) saves money when the HIV prevalence among donors is above 0.7 per 100 000.

Conclusion For Norway, studies suggest a willingness to pay to save a statistical life of approximately US$ 1.2 million. The costs fall under this value when the number of infected persons is >=8 per 100 000 donors. The results are uncertain because of the uncertainty in HTLV infection and disease parameters.

Keywords Cost effect analysis, cost utility analysis, HTLV, HIV, mathematical model, blood donors, transfusion

Accepted 8 May 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
P. Martin-Davila, J. Fortun, R. Lopez-Velez, F. Norman, M. Montes de Oca, P. Zamarron, M. I. Gonzalez, A. Moreno, T. Pumarola, G. Garrido, et al.
Transmission of Tropical and Geographically Restricted Infections during Solid-Organ Transplantation
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2008; 21(1): 60 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.