Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parker, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2000;29:1065-1069
© International Epidemiological Association 2000

Assessing research outcomes by postal questionnaire with telephone follow-up

Cj Parkera, Me Deweyb and on Behalf Of The Total Study Group,c

a Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
b Trent Institute for Health Services Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
c The TOTAL Study Group. Nottingham: John Gladman, Avril Drummond, Michael Dewey, Nadina Lincoln, Chris Parker, Philippa Logan, Kate Radford; Aintree: Department of Medicine for the Elderly Research Team: Anil Sharma, Caroline Watkins, Michael Leathley, Hazel Dickinson, Elaine Mackie, Jan Rhodes, Liz Lightbody; OT service: Julie Murray, Geralyn Lennon, Carol Mullarkey, Hazel McCormick, Val Chisnall, Sean McCann; Bristol: Meg Birch, Helen Smith, Dave Gamm, Mary Vincent, Sally Chorlton, Dee Sessions; Edinburgh: Martin Dennis, Alison Chalmers, Lesley Moffat; Glasgow: Peter Langhorne, Joyce Peters, Karen Blackwood, Louise Gilbertson; Newcastle: David Barer, Susan Fall.

Reprint requests: Dr ME Dewey, Trent Institute for Health Services Research, Floor B Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. E-mail: michael.dewey{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Background Face-to-face assessment of research outcomes is expensive and may introduce bias. Postal questionnaires offer a cheaper alternative which avoids observer bias, but non-response and incomplete response reduce the effective sample size and may be equally serious sources of bias. This study examines the extent and potential effects of missing data in the postal collection of outcomes for a large rehabilitation trial.

Methods Questionnaires containing a number of established scales were posted to participants in a trial of occupational therapy after stroke. Response was maximized by telephone and postal reminders, and incomplete questionnaires were followed up by telephone. Scale scores obtained by imputing values to questionnaire items missing on return were compared with those achieved by telephone follow-up.

Findings Response to the initial posting was 60%, rising to 85% after reminders. Participants receiving the experimental treatment were more likely to respond without a reminder. There were no significant differences on any known factors between eventual responders and non-responders. Of the questionnaires, 43% were incomplete on return: partial responders were significantly different to complete responders on baseline disability and home circumstances. Of the incomplete questionnaires, 71% were resolved by telephone follow-up. In these, the scale scores achieved by telephone were generally higher than those derived by conventional imputation.

Conclusion Postal outcome assessment achieved a good response rate, but considerable effort was needed to minimize non-response and incomplete response, both of which could have been serious sources of bias.

Keywords Research outcomes, bias, postal questionnaires, stroke therapy

Accepted 8 May 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
J-L Lienard, E Quinaux, E Fabre-Guillevin, P Piedbois, A Jouhaud, G Decoster, M Buyse, and on behalf of the European Association
Impact of on-site initiation visits on patient recruitment and data quality in a randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer
Clinical Trials, October 1, 2006; 3(5): 486 - 492.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
C. L Paul, R. A Walsh, and F. Tzelepis
A monetary incentive increases postal survey response rates for pharmacists
J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2005; 59(12): 1099 - 1101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
A. Bowling
Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality
J Public Health, September 1, 2005; 27(3): 281 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P A Logan, J R F Gladman, A Avery, M F Walker, J Dyas, and L Groom
Randomised controlled trial of an occupational therapy intervention to increase outdoor mobility after stroke
BMJ, December 11, 2004; 329(7479): 1372 - 1375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Brogger, P. Bakke, G. E. Eide, and A. Gulsvik
Contribution of Follow-up of Nonresponders to Prevalence and Risk Estimates: A Norwegian Respiratory Health Survey
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2003; 157(6): 558 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A E. Drummond, C J Parker, J R. Gladman, and P A Logan
Development and validation of the Nottingham Leisure Questionnaire (NLQ)
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2001; 15(6): 647 - 656.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.