International Journal of Epidemiology 2000;29:1041-1046
© International Epidemiological Association 2000
How exclusive is exclusive breastfeeding? A comparison of data since birth with current status data
Section for International Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Reprint requests: Clara Aarts, Section for International Maternal and Child Health—IMCH, University Hospital, Entrance 11, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden. E-mail: Clara.Aarts{at}kbh.uu.se
Background There is no accepted and widely used indicator for exclusive breastfeeding since birth. Indeed, the difference between ‘current status’ data on exclusive breastfeeding and data on ‘exclusive breastfeeding since birth’ is rarely recognized. We used data from a longitudinal study to examine this issue.
Methods A descriptive longitudinal, prospective study design was used in which 506 mother-infant pairs were included. The mothers completed daily recordings on infant feeding during the first nine months after birth. A research assistant conducted fortnightly home visits with structured interviews. The resulting data on breastfeeding patterns are presented in two different ways: analysis of ‘current status’ data based on a single 24-hour recording of infant feeding at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, and analysis of data ‘since birth’, i.e. data on infant feeding for every day, starting from birth until the ages of 2, 4 and 6 months.
Results A wide discrepancy between the results obtained from the two analyses was found. The difference in the exclusive breastfeeding rate was over 40 percentage points at both 2 and 4 months of age (92% versus 51% at 2 months and 73% versus 30% at 4 months) and 9 percentage points at 6 months (11% versus 1.8%).
Conclusions Current status indicators based on a 24-hour period may be inadequate and even misleading for many purposes. We propose that in many studies an indicator called ‘exclusive breastfeeding since birth’ could be added.
Keywords Breastfeeding definitions, breastfeeding indicators, exclusive breastfeeding, Sweden
Accepted 15 February 2000
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. N. Haiek, D. L. Gauthier, D. Brosseau, and L. Rocheleau Understanding Breastfeeding Behavior: Rates and Shifts in Patterns in Quebec J Hum Lact, February 1, 2007; 23(1): 24 - 31. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Wamani, A. N. Astrom, S. Peterson, T. Tylleskar, and J. K. Tumwine Infant and Young Child Feeding in Western Uganda: Knowledge, Practices and Socio-economic Correlates J Trop Pediatr, December 1, 2005; 51(6): 356 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R M Bland, N C Rollins, G Solarsh, J Van den Broeck, and H M Coovadia Maternal recall of exclusive breast feeding duration Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 2003; 88(9): 778 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. J. Hruschka, D. W. Sellen, A. D. Stein, and R. Martorell Delayed Onset of Lactation and Risk of Ending Full Breast-Feeding Early in Rural Guatemala J. Nutr., August 1, 2003; 133(8): 2592 - 2599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Cattaneo and R. Buzzetti Quality improvement report: Effect on rates of breast feeding of training for the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative BMJ, December 8, 2001; 323(7325): 1358 - 1362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|