Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Basso, O.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Basso, O.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2000;29:856-861
© International Epidemiological Association 2000

Time to pregnancy as a correlate of fecundity: differential persistence in trying to become pregnant as a source of bias

Olga Basso, Svend Juul and Jørn Olsen

The Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Aarhus University at the Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Vennelyst Boulevard 6, DK 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. E-mail: OB{at}soci.au.dk

Background Subfecundity is a frequent and often serious problem and it is important to identify its preventable determinants and to monitor fecundity over time. Since follow-up studies are difficult and expensive to conduct, time to pregnancy (TTP) in pregnant women is often used as a surrogate measure of fecundity. TTP data can be retrieved at low costs and they need no valid population registry as a source for sampling. While TTP may serve as a valid surrogate measure in many situations, its validity rests upon a number of assumptions. We have analysed one of these overlooked assumptions, the importance of persistence in trying to become pregnant.

Methods By means of computer simulations we estimated bias caused by differences in persistence in pregnancy attempts. We investigated whether the assumptions made in the simulation were realistic by using empirical data from a European study.

Results The mean waiting time to pregnancy and other estimates of subfecundity (or infertility) strongly depend upon the persistence of couples in pursuing a pregnancy. We show that even moderate changes in the planning behaviour considerably modify the waiting time distribution. Empirical data confirm that persistence in trying to become pregnant is age-related.

Conclusions Persistence in pregnancy attempts affects outcome measures of subfecundity in studies based upon TTP in pregnant women. It is likely that the length of time during which couples keep trying to become pregnant is influenced by a number of factors which would probably change over time or be different between populations to be compared.

Keywords Time-to-pregnancy, fecundity, epidemiology, bias

Accepted 13 April 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. A. Wise, L. Titus-Ernstoff, J. R. Palmer, R. N. Hoover, E. E. Hatch, K. M. Perez, W. C. Strohsnitter, R. Kaufman, D. Anderson, and R. Troisi
Time to Pregnancy and Secondary Sex Ratio in Men Exposed Prenatally to Diethylstilbestrol
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2007; 166(7): 765 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. B. Stanford and D. B. Dunson
Effects of Sexual Intercourse Patterns in Time to Pregnancy Studies
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2007; 165(9): 1088 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Joffe, J. Key, N. Best, N. Keiding, T. Scheike, and T. K. Jensen
Studying Time to Pregnancy by Use of a Retrospective Design
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2005; 162(2): 115 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.A.M. Hassan and S.R. Killick
Is previous aberrant reproductive outcome predictive of subsequently reduced fecundity?
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 657 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.A.M. Hassan and S.R. Killick
Is previous use of hormonal contraception associated with a detrimental effect on subsequent fecundity?
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 344 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
J L Zhu, N H Hjollund, H Boggild, and J Olsen
Shift work and subfecundity: a causal link or an artefact?
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2003; 60(9): e12 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. D. Rosa, S. Zarrilli, L. Paesano, U. Carbone, B. Boggia, M. Petretta, A. Maisto, F. Cimmino, G. Puca, A. Colao, et al.
Traffic pollutants affect fertility in men
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 1055 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Joffe
Invited Commentary: The Potential for Monitoring of Fecundity and the Remaining Challenges
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2003; 157(2): 89 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Olsen and P. Rachootin
Invited Commentary: Monitoring Fecundity over Time--If We Do It, Then Let's Do It Right
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2003; 157(2): 94 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Juhl, A.-M. Nyboe Andersen, M. Gronbak, and J. Olsen
Moderate alcohol consumption and waiting time to pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2705 - 2709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.