International Journal of Epidemiology 2000;29:856-861
© International Epidemiological Association 2000
Time to pregnancy as a correlate of fecundity: differential persistence in trying to become pregnant as a source of bias
The Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Aarhus University at the Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Vennelyst Boulevard 6, DK 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. E-mail: OB{at}soci.au.dk
Background Subfecundity is a frequent and often serious problem and it is important to identify its preventable determinants and to monitor fecundity over time. Since follow-up studies are difficult and expensive to conduct, time to pregnancy (TTP) in pregnant women is often used as a surrogate measure of fecundity. TTP data can be retrieved at low costs and they need no valid population registry as a source for sampling. While TTP may serve as a valid surrogate measure in many situations, its validity rests upon a number of assumptions. We have analysed one of these overlooked assumptions, the importance of persistence in trying to become pregnant.
Methods By means of computer simulations we estimated bias caused by differences in persistence in pregnancy attempts. We investigated whether the assumptions made in the simulation were realistic by using empirical data from a European study.
Results The mean waiting time to pregnancy and other estimates of subfecundity (or infertility) strongly depend upon the persistence of couples in pursuing a pregnancy. We show that even moderate changes in the planning behaviour considerably modify the waiting time distribution. Empirical data confirm that persistence in trying to become pregnant is age-related.
Conclusions Persistence in pregnancy attempts affects outcome measures of subfecundity in studies based upon TTP in pregnant women. It is likely that the length of time during which couples keep trying to become pregnant is influenced by a number of factors which would probably change over time or be different between populations to be compared.
Keywords Time-to-pregnancy, fecundity, epidemiology, bias
Accepted 13 April 2000
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Joffe What has happened to human fertility? Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2010; 25(2): 295 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Key, N. Best, M. Joffe, T. K. Jensen, and N. Keiding Methodological Issues in Analyzing Time Trends in Biologic Fertility: Protection Bias Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2009; 169(3): 285 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Wise, L. Titus-Ernstoff, J. R. Palmer, R. N. Hoover, E. E. Hatch, K. M. Perez, W. C. Strohsnitter, R. Kaufman, D. Anderson, and R. Troisi Time to Pregnancy and Secondary Sex Ratio in Men Exposed Prenatally to Diethylstilbestrol Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2007; 166(7): 765 - 774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. B. Stanford and D. B. Dunson Effects of Sexual Intercourse Patterns in Time to Pregnancy Studies Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2007; 165(9): 1088 - 1095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Joffe, J. Key, N. Best, N. Keiding, T. Scheike, and T. K. Jensen Studying Time to Pregnancy by Use of a Retrospective Design Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2005; 162(2): 115 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.A.M. Hassan and S.R. Killick Is previous aberrant reproductive outcome predictive of subsequently reduced fecundity? Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 657 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.A.M. Hassan and S.R. Killick Is previous use of hormonal contraception associated with a detrimental effect on subsequent fecundity? Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 344 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J L Zhu, N H Hjollund, H Boggild, and J Olsen Shift work and subfecundity: a causal link or an artefact? Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2003; 60(9): e12 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Rosa, S. Zarrilli, L. Paesano, U. Carbone, B. Boggia, M. Petretta, A. Maisto, F. Cimmino, G. Puca, A. Colao, et al. Traffic pollutants affect fertility in men Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 1055 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Joffe Invited Commentary: The Potential for Monitoring of Fecundity and the Remaining Challenges Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2003; 157(2): 89 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Olsen and P. Rachootin Invited Commentary: Monitoring Fecundity over Time--If We Do It, Then Let's Do It Right Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2003; 157(2): 94 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Juhl, A.-M. Nyboe Andersen, M. Gronbak, and J. Olsen Moderate alcohol consumption and waiting time to pregnancy Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2705 - 2709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|