Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pesch, B.
Right arrow Articles by MURC Study Group, t.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pesch, B.
Right arrow Articles by MURC Study Group, t.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology 2000;29:238-247
© International Epidemiological Association 2000

Occupational risk factors for urothelial carcinoma: agent-specific results from a case-control study in Germany

Beate Pescha, Johannes Haertingb, Ulrich Ranfta, Andreas Klimpelc, Burkhard Oelschlägelb, Walter Schilld and the MURC Study Group,e

a Medical Institute for Environmental Hygiene at the Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Germany.
b Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometry and Medical Informatics at the Martin Luther University, Halle, Germany.
c Institute for Kidney and Hypertension Research, Berlin, Germany.
d Bremen Institute for Prevention Research and Social Medicine, Bremen, Germany.
e Collaborators of the Multicenter Urothelial and Renal Cancer Study (MURC Study Group): Wolfgang Barth, Uta Brettschneider, Elisabeth Bronder,

Reprint requests to: Beate Pesch, Unit of Environmental Epidemiology, Medical Institute for Environmental Hygiene, Auf'm Hennekamp 50, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.

Background This multicentre population-based case-control study was conducted to estimate the urothelial cancer risk for occupational exposure to aromatic amines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), and chlorinated hydrocarbons besides other suspected risk factors.

Methods In a population-based multicentre study, 1035 incident urothelial cancer cases and 4298 controls matched for region, sex, and age were interviewed between 1991 and 1995 for their occupational history and lifestyle habits. Exposure to the agents under study was self-assessed as well as expert-rated with two job-exposure matrices and a job task-exposure matrix. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate smoking adjusted odds ratios (OR) and to control for study centre and age.

Results Urothelial cancer risk following exposure to aromatic amines was only slightly elevated. Among males, substantial exposures to PAH as well as to chlorinated solvents and their corresponding occupational settings were associated with significantly elevated risks after adjustment for smoking (PAH exposure, assessed with a job-exposure matrix: OR = 1.6, 95% CI : 1.1–2.3, exposure to chlorinated solvents, assessed with a job task-exposure matrix : OR = 1.8, 95% CI : 1.2–2.6). Metal degreasing showed an elevated urothelial cancer risk among males (OR = 2.3, 95% CI : 1.4–3.8). In females also, exposure to chlorinated solvents indicated a urothelial cancer risk. Because of small numbers the risk evaluation for females should be treated with caution.

Conclusions Occupational exposure to aromatic amines could not be shown to be as strong a risk factor for urothelial carcinomas as in the past. A possible explanation for this finding is the reduction in exposure over the last 50 years. Our results strengthen the evidence that PAH may have a carcinogenic potential for the urothelium. Furthermore, our results indicate a urothelial cancer risk for the use of chlorinated solvents.

Keywords Bladder cancer, urothelial cancer, case-control study, aromatic amines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), chlorinated solvents, job-exposure matrix

Accepted 29 September 1999


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
W. B. GRANT
Air Pollution in Relation to U.S. Cancer Mortality Rates: An Ecological Study; Likely Role of Carbonaceous Aerosols and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Anticancer Res, September 1, 2009; 29(9): 3537 - 3545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
R R W Gaertner and G P Theriault
Risk of bladder cancer in foundry workers: a meta-analysis
Occup. Environ. Med., October 1, 2002; 59(10): 655 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M P A Zeegers, G M H Swaen, I Kant, R A Goldbohm, and P A van den Brandt
Occupational risk factors for male bladder cancer: results from a population based case cohort study in the Netherlands
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2001; 58(9): 590 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
M. D. Boudreau, D. G. Baker, H. W. Taylor, S. A. Barker, and J. C. Means
Suppression of Arylamine Toxicity in the Fischer-344 Rat Following Ingestion of a Complex Mixture
Toxicol Pathol, April 1, 2001; 29(3): 333 - 343.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
B. Pesch, J. Haerting, U. Ranft, A. Klimpel, B. Oelschlagel, and W. Schill
Occupational risk factors for renal cell carcinoma: agent-specific results from a case-control study in Germany
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2000; 29(6): 1014 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.