Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reijneveld, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Stronks, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reijneveld, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Stronks, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 28, 1134-1140, Copyright © 1999 by International Epidemiological Association


The impact of response bias on estimates of health care utilization in a metropolitan area: the use of administrative data

SA Reijneveld and K Stronks
Department of Public Health, Leiden, The Netherlands. SA.Reijneveld@pg.tno.nl

BACKGROUND: Surveys among the general population are an important method for collecting epidemiological data on health and utilization of health care in that population. Selective non-response may affect the validity of these data. This study examines the impact of response bias on estimates of health care utilization and on risk estimates for utilization in relation to demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, using administrative data on use of health care. METHODS: Data on registered health care utilization were extracted from a health insurance register and linked to respondents (2,934; 62.7%) and non-respondents (1,744) in a personal health interview survey among adult residents from the lower two-thirds income bracket in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. RESULTS: Estimates of registered health care utilization are higher if based on respondents only, than if they are based on the entire target sample. This goes for prescription drugs, specialist medical care, paramedical care, dental care and medical aids, but not for hospital care. Most risk estimates of registered utilization for background characterisitcs (gender, family composition, marital status, year of settlement, affluence of neighbourhood and ethnicity) differ only slightly and without statistical significance. If different, most estimates based on respondents only are somewhat higher. The largest differences are found for age (average overestimation of risks for age groups 35-64 and 65+ years compared to that of 16-34 years: 16% and 17%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, response bias affects estimates of registered health care utilization but hardly affects risk estimates of utilization by background characteristics.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
J. Gundgaard, O. Ekholm, E. H. Hansen, and N. Kr. Rasmussen
The effect of non-response on estimates of health care utilisation: linking health surveys and registers
Eur J Public Health, April 1, 2008; 18(2): 189 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
V. Lorant, S. Demarest, P.-J. Miermans, and H. Van Oyen
Survey error in measuring socio-economic risk factors of health status: a comparison of a survey and a census
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2007; 36(6): 1292 - 1299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
M. Kjoller and H. Thoning
Characteristics of non-response in the Danish Health Interview Surveys, 1987-1994
Eur J Public Health, October 1, 2005; 15(5): 528 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. Tooth, R. Ware, C. Bain, D. M. Purdie, and A. Dobson
Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Research
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2005; 161(3): 280 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Brogger, P. Bakke, G. E. Eide, and A. Gulsvik
Contribution of Follow-up of Nonresponders to Prevalence and Risk Estimates: A Norwegian Respiratory Health Survey
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2003; 157(6): 558 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clinical Child Psychology and PsychiatryHome page
T. Ford, R. Goodman, and H. Meltzer
Service Use Over 18 Months among a Nationally Representative Sample of British Children with Psychiatric Disorder
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, January 1, 2003; 8(1): 37 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
S A Reijneveld
Neighbourhood socioeconomic context and self reported health and smoking: a secondary analysis of data on seven cities
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, December 1, 2002; 56(12): 935 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. A Reijneveld and K. Stronks
The validity of self-reported use of health care across socioeconomic strata: a comparison of survey and registration data
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2001; 30(6): 1407 - 1414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
K Stronks, A C J Ravelli, and S A Reijneveld
Immigrants in the Netherlands: Equal access for equal needs?
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, October 1, 2001; 55(10): 701 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
H S J Picavet
National health surveys by mail or home interview: effects on response
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, June 1, 2001; 55(6): 408 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
S. A Reijneveld, R. A Verheij, and D. H de Bakker
The impact of area deprivation on differences in health: does the choice of the geographical classification matter?
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, April 1, 2000; 54(4): 306 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.