Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agudo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agudo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 28, 1130-1133, Copyright © 1999 by International Epidemiological Association

Secondary matching: a method for selecting controls in case-control studies on environmental risk factors

A Agudo and CA Gonzalez
Institute of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Mataro, Spain. agudo@csm.scs.es

BACKGROUND: The problem of control selection was considered in a population-based case-control study on pleural mesothelioma in Spain. Random sampling from the population was discarded because of potential selection bias due to low participation. Selection of hospital controls by matching them to cases by hospital seemed unsuitable for investigating environmental exposures, as the choice of hospital may be related to the place of residence; controlling for residence may avoid bias but could produce overmatching. METHODS: A three-step procedure was proposed. First, a random sample of primary controls from the population census of the province of Barcelona was obtained. Second, the hospital closest to the residence of the primary control was identified as the control hospital. Third a secondary control was chosen among patients admitted to the hospital matched to the primary control by sex, age and municipality. RESULTS: An overall participation rate of 85% was achieved. The hospital control group showed a distribution of residences similar to that of the general population, and independent of the distribution of cases. CONCLUSIONS: This procedure may be considered as an alternative for control selection when studying environmental factors or, generally, when matching cases and controls by hospital is to be avoided. Its validity was assessed according to the principles of comparability with cases regarding the study base, accuracy of information, deconfounding and efficiency.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
M. GOODMAN, M. J. TETA, P. A. HESSEL, D. H. GARABRANT, V. A. CRAVEN, C. G. SCRAFFORD, and M. A. KELSH
Mesothelioma and Lung Cancer Among Motor Vehicle Mechanics: a Meta-analysis
Ann. Hyg., June 1, 2004; 48(4): 309 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.