Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quigley, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rodrigues, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Quigley, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rodrigues, L. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 28, 1081-1087, Copyright © 1999 by International Epidemiological Association


Diagnostic accuracy of physician review, expert algorithms and data- derived algorithms in adult verbal autopsies

MA Quigley, D Chandramohan and LC Rodrigues
Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.

BACKGROUND: The verbal autopsy (VA) is used to collect information on cause-specific mortality from bereaved relatives. A cause of death may be assigned by physician review of the questionnaires, or by an algorithm. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of physician review, an expert algorithm, and data-derived algorithms. METHODS: Data were drawn from a multicentre validation study of 796 adult deaths that occurred in hospitals in Tanzania, Ethiopia, and Ghana. A 'gold standard' cause of death was assigned using hospital records and death certificates. The VA interviews were carried out by trained fieldworkers 1-21 months after the subject's death. A cause of death was assigned by physician review and an expert algorithm. Data-derived algorithms that most accurately estimated the cause-specific mortality fraction (CSMF) for each cause of death were identified using logistic regression. RESULTS: The most common causes of death were tuberculosis/AIDS (CSMF = 18.6%), malaria (CSMF = 10.7%), meningitis (CSMF = 8.3%), and cardiovascular disorders (CSMF = 8.2%). The CSMF obtained using physician review was within +/-20% of the gold standard value for 12 causes of death including the four common causes. The CSMF obtained using the expert algorithm was within +/-20% of the gold standard for eight causes of death, including tuberculosis/AIDS, malaria, and meningitis. The CSMF obtained using the data-derived algorithms was within +/-20% of the gold standard for seven causes of death, including tuberculosis/ AIDS, meningitis, and cardiovascular disorders. All three methods yielded a specificity of at least 80% for all causes of death, and a sensitivity of at least 80% for deaths due to injuries and rabies. CONCLUSIONS: For those settings where physician review is not feasible, expert and data- derived algorithms provide an alternative approach for assigning many causes of death. We recommend that the algorithms proposed herein are validated further.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
P. Byass, E. Fottrell, Dao Lan Huong, Y. Berhane, T. Corrah, K. Kahn, L. Muhe, and Do Duc Van
Refining a probabilistic model for interpreting verbal autopsy data
Scand J Public Health, January 1, 2006; 34(1): 26 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Begg, C. Rao, and A. D Lopez
Design options for sample-based mortality surveillance
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 34(5): 1080 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
P. Byass, Dao Lan Huong, and Hoang Van Minh
A probabilistic approach to interpreting verbal autopsies: methodology and preliminary validation in Vietnam
Scand J Public Health, December 1, 2003; 31(6_suppl): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Jaffar, A. Leach, P. G Smith, F. Cutts, and B. Greenwood
Effects of misclassification of causes of death on the power of a trial to assess the efficacy of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in The Gambia
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2003; 32(3): 430 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
P. Byass, Dao Lan Huong, and Hoang Van Minh
A probabilistic approach to interpreting verbal autopsies: methodology and preliminary validation in Vietnam
Scand J Public Health, January 1, 2003; 31(1): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
D. Chandramohan, P. Setel, and M. Quigley
Effect of misclassification of causes of death in verbal autopsy: can it be adjusted?
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2001; 30(3): 509 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
A. Boulle, D. Chandramohan, and P. Weller
A case study of using artificial neural networks for classifying cause of death from verbal autopsy
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2001; 30(3): 515 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
A M Sibai, A Fletcher, M Hills, and O Campbell
Non-communicable disease mortality rates using the verbal autopsy in a cohort of middle aged and older populations in Beirut during wartime, 1983-93
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, April 1, 2001; 55(4): 271 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.