Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newcomb, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Trentham-Dietz, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Newcomb, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Trentham-Dietz, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 28, 603-608, Copyright © 1999 by International Epidemiological Association


ARTICLES

Interactions of familial and hormonal risk factors for large bowel cancer in women

PA Newcomb, JO Taylor and A Trentham-Dietz
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

BACKGROUND: Family history of colorectal cancer has been consistently associated with an increased personal risk of this disease. Since evidence suggests that hormones are related to colon cancer risk in women, the effect of family history on large bowel incidence may be modified according to endogenous and exogenous hormone levels. METHODS: We analysed data from a population-based case-control study of female colorectal cancer to evaluate family history and cancer risk. Cases (n = 702) were female residents of Wisconsin with a new diagnosis of colorectal cancer, identified through a statewide tumour registry. Controls (n = 2274) were randomly selected from lists of licensed drivers and from rosters of Medicare beneficiaries. All relative risks (RR) were adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking and alcohol history, education, and use of hormone replacement therapy. RESULTS: Compared with women who reported no history of cancer in a first degree relative, women with a family history had an RR of 2.07 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.60-2.68). Regardless of which parent was affected, risks were increased about twofold, while sibling history was associated with about a 50% increase in risk. Risk was greater if more than one family member was affected (RR 3.65, 95% CI: 1.81-7.37). The association between family history and risk was stronger for colon cancer than for rectal cancer. There were no indications that exogenous hormonal factors, notably hormone replacement use, modified these risks. There was a suggestion that high parity attenuated the risks associated with family history (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that family history of colorectal cancer is associated with a doubling of risk for large bowel cancer in women; some histories were associated with greater risk. This relation was not substantially different among subgroups of women with varying exogenous and endogenous hormone exposures.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
N Andrieu, G Launoy, R Guillois, C Ory-Paoletti, and M Gignoux
Estimation of the familial relative risk of cancer by site from a French population based family study on colorectal cancer (CCREF study)
Gut, September 1, 2004; 53(9): 1322 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
H S Evans, H Moller, D Robinson, C M Lewis, C M J Bell, and S V Hodgson
The risk of subsequent primary cancers after colorectal cancer in southeast England
Gut, May 1, 2002; 50(5): 647 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.