Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langendam, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by van Ameijden, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Langendam, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by van Ameijden, E. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 28, 514-520, Copyright © 1999 by International Epidemiological Association


ARTICLES

The validity of drug users' self-reports in a non-treatment setting: prevalence and predictors of incorrect reporting methadone treatment modalities

MW Langendam, HJ van Haastrecht and EJ van Ameijden
Municipal Health Service, Division of Public Health and Environment, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. mlangendam@gggd.amsterdam.nl

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies among drug users are often based on retrospective self-reports. However, among others, memory failure, being under the influence of drugs, psychopathology, misunderstanding of questions and socially desirable answering may generate inaccurate reporting. METHODS: This study validated self-reported current (methadone dosage) and medium-term (main location of methadone dispensing and frequency of methadone programme attendance over the previous 4-6 months) aspects of methadone treatment in the Amsterdam AIDS cohort study among drug users, using data of the Central Methadone Register. In addition to descriptive measures, logistic regression analysis was used (adjusted for intra-individual correlation) to identify subgroups with incorrect reporting. Data collected at 4406 visits of 505 cohort participants were analysed. RESULTS: Current methadone dosage was accurately reported (unweighted kappa [kappa]: 0.94, weighted kappa [kappa W]: 0.97). A low methadone dosage, short duration of school education and depressive or euphoric mood during the interview were significant and independent predictors of incorrect reporting of methadone dosage. For main location of dispensing kappa was 0.82, for frequency of programme attendance kappa was 0.53 and kappa W 0.87. There was a tendency to reporting the extreme answering categories. Infrequent programme attendance was the only significant predictor of incorrectly reporting frequency of programme attendance. CONCLUSIONS: Drug users are able to give valid self-reports in a setting where social desirability does not play an important role. The main reasons of incorrect reporting were impaired cognitive functioning, memory failure and misunderstanding of questions.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
S. Fanoe, C. Hvidt, P. Ege, and G. B. Jensen
Syncope and QT prolongation among patients treated with methadone for heroin dependence in the city of Copenhagen
Heart, September 1, 2007; 93(9): 1051 - 1055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
F. Termorshuizen, A. Krol, M. Prins, and E. J. C. van Ameijden
Long-term Outcome of Chronic Drug Use: The Amsterdam Cohort Study among Drug Users
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2005; 161(3): 271 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
E J C van Ameijden and R A Coutinho
Large decline in injecting drug use in Amsterdam, 1986-1998: explanatory mechanisms and determinants of injecting transitions
J Epidemiol Community Health, May 1, 2001; 55(5): 356 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.