Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Timpka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ahlgren, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Timpka, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ahlgren, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 28, 502-508, Copyright © 1999 by International Epidemiological Association


ARTICLES

Community-based injury prevention: effects on health care utilization

T Timpka, K Lindqvist, L Schelp and M Ahlgren
Department of Social Medicine and Public Health Science, Linkoping University, Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, an estimated 78 million people are disabled each year because of unintentional injuries and about 3 million die. The WHO Safe Community model is a framework for community-based injury prevention programmes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome on health care utilization of a Safe Community programme. METHODS: The incidence of injuries treated at health care facilities in an intervention municipality (pop. 41,000) was compared to the injury incidence in a control municipality (pop. 26,000). The incidence was recorded immediately before and one year after programme implementation from registrations made during all first-contact health care visits and from examination of hospital discharge registers. RESULTS: The incidence of health care treated injuries in the intervention area had decreased by 13% (95% CI: 9-16%) from 119 (95% CI: 115-122) per 1000 population-years to 104 (95% CI: 101-107). In the control area, the corresponding injury incidences were 104 (95% CI: 100-108) and 106 (95% CI: 102-109). The hospital-treated injuries in the intervention area decreased by 15% (95% CI: 7-24%) from 19 (95% CI: 17-20) per 1000 population-years to 16 (95% CI: 15-17), while in the control area, the incidences remained at 13 (95% CI: 11-14) per 1000 population-years. Utilization of acute care in the intervention area for reasons other than injuries increased by 8% (95% CI: 6-10%), while in the control area, the number of visits did not show significant change. CONCLUSION: This first controlled evaluation showed that an injury prevention programme based on local action groups can significantly reduce injuries requiring health care in a community. Local prevention can provide a complement to national level campaigns.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
P Nilsen
What makes community based injury prevention work? In search of evidence of effectiveness
Inj. Prev., October 1, 2004; 10(5): 268 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
K Lindqvist, T Timpka, and N Karlsson
Impact of social standing on injury prevention in a World Health Organization Safe Community--intervention outcome by household employment contract
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2004; 33(3): 605 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
J J Knapik, S H Bullock, S Canada, E Toney, J D Wells, E Hoedebecke, and B H Jones
Influence of an injury reduction program on injury and fitness outcomes among soldiers
Inj. Prev., February 1, 2004; 10(1): 37 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
Z. Zhao and L. Svanstrom
Injury status and perspectives on developing community safety promotion in China
Health Promot. Int., September 1, 2003; 18(3): 247 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.