International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 28, 347-352, Copyright © 1999 by International Epidemiological Association
ML Garly, CL Martins, C Bale, F da Costa, F Dias, H Whittle and P Aaby
BACKGROUND: Previous studies from Africa have suggested that there is
little benefit to be gained from early two-dose measles vaccination
schedules. Two-dose schedules have been associated with no improvement in
coverage due to immunization of the same individuals on both occasions, low
return rate, high refusal rate, low vaccine efficacy, and fear of blunting
of the antibody response. Because of the poor results achieved previously
with two-dose measles vaccination schedules, we studied patterns of
participation, reasons for non- participation, vaccination coverage and
relative efficacy of a one-dose versus a two-dose schedule in connection
with the implementation of an early two-dose trial in Guinea-Bissau.
METHODS: Children born from September 1994 to January 1996 were randomized
into two groups receiving either two doses of measles vaccine at 6 and 9
months or one dose of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) at 6 months and
measles vaccine at 9 months. RESULTS: At 6 months of age 86% (1869/2181) of
the children participated, and at 9 months of age participation was 87%
(1775/2035). The return rate for obtaining a second dose of vaccine was 93%
(1647/1773). The main reason for not participating was travelling (78%).
Around 50% of those who did not take part in one vaccination took part in
the other. When only children participating the first time they were called
for a measles vaccination were included, the measles vaccination coverage
in the one-dose group was 59% versus 80% in the two-dose group, i.e. a 50%
reduction in the risk of not being vaccinated (relative risk [RR] 0.50;
confidence interval [CI]: 0.43- 0.57). Few measles cases have occurred in
the study area since the implementation of the trial making precise
estimation of the relative efficacy of the two vaccine strategies
difficult, but all seven clinically diagnosed measles cases occurred in the
one-dose group making the relative efficacy for the two-dose group compared
with the one-dose group 100% (95% CI: 35%-100%; two-tailed P = 0.016). When
including maternal reports, the relative efficacy was 90% (95% exact
confidence interval; two-tailed P = 25%-97%, P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: In
this study of a two-dose measles immunization schedule at 6 and 9 months of
age there was no sign of low participation or poor return rates. The risk
of not being vaccinated was lower in the two-dose group than in the
one-dose group, and the relative efficacy of a two-dose versus a one-dose
schedule was high. Although our results were obtained within a trial where
dedicated personnel informed every participant personally about the study,
we believe our results indicate that with thorough information about the
population it may be possible to achieve a higher coverage with a two-dose
measles vaccination schedule than a one-dose schedule. A two-dose schedule
may be a feasible way to resolve the problems of low coverage and severe
measles infection among infants.
ARTICLES
Early two-dose measles vaccination schedule in Guinea-Bissau: good protection and coverage in infancy
Projecto de Saude de Bandim, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. L Martins, M.-L. Garly, C. Bale, A. Rodrigues, H. Ravn, H. C Whittle, I. M Lisse, and P. Aaby Protective efficacy of standard Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccination in infants aged 4.5 months: interim analysis of a randomised clinical trial BMJ, July 24, 2008; 337(jul24_2): a661 - a661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-L. Garly, C. Bale, C. L. Martins, H. C Whittle, J. Nielsen, I. M Lisse, and P. Aaby Prophylactic antibiotics to prevent pneumonia and other complications after measles: community based randomised double blind placebo controlled trial in Guinea-Bissau BMJ, December 16, 2006; 333(7581): 1245 - 1245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Aaby, H. Jensen, A. Rodrigues, M.-L. Garly, C. S. Benn, I. M. Lisse, and F. Simondon Divergent female-male mortality ratios associated with different routine vaccinations among female-male twin pairs Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2004; 33(2): 367 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kristensen, P. Aaby, H. Jensen, and P. Fine Routine vaccinations and child survival: follow up study in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa Commentary: an unexpected finding that needs confirmation or rejection BMJ, December 9, 2000; 321(7274): 1435 - 1435. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||

