Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, W.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, W.-C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

research-article

The meaning and use of the cumulative rate of potential life lost

Wen-Chung Lee

Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University and National Defense Medical Center ROC

Reprint requests: Dr Wen-Chung Lee, Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, National Taiwan University No. 1, Jen-Al Rd. 1st Sec. Taipei, Taiwan, ROC

BACKGROUND: The ‘years of potential life lost’ (YPLL) is a public health measure in widespread use. However, the index does not apply to the comparisons between different populations or across different time periods. It also has the limit of being cross- sectional in nature, quantifying current burden but not future impact on society.

METHODS: A new years-lost index is proposed—the ‘cumulative rate of potential life lost’ (CRPLL). It is a simple combination of the ‘cumulative rate’ (CR) and the YPLL. Vital statistics in Taiwan are used for demonstration and comparison of the new mdcx with existing health-status measures.

RESULTS: The CRPLL serves the purpose of between-group comparison. It can also be considered a projection of future impact, under the assumption that the age-specific mortality rates in the current year prevail. For a rare cause of death, it can be interpreted as the expected years (days) of potential life lost during a subject's lifetime.

CONCLUSIONS: The CRPLL has several desirable properties, rendering it a promising alternative for quantifying health status.

Keywords Age standardization, cumulative rate, epidemiological methods, health-status indicator, life expectancy, vital statistics, years of potential life lost

Accepted 20 April 1998


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
R. Wurthwein, A. Gbangou, R. Sauerborn, and C. M Schmidt
Measuring the local burden of disease. A study of years of life lost in sub-Saharan Africa
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2001; 30(3): 501 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.