Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Misago, C.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Misago, C.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

research-article

Determinants of abortion among women admitted to hospitals in Fortaleza, North Eastern Brazil

Chizuru Misagoa,, Walter Fonsecab, Luciano correiab, Lucilia M Fernandesc and Oona Campbella

aMaternal and Child Epidemiology Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine UK
bDepartment of Community Health. Universidade Federal do Ceará Brazil
cInstitute of Woman and Child Health. Fortaleza Brazil

Reprint requests to: Ms Chlzuru Misago's current address: Institute of Women and Child Health—Rua Silva Jatahy no. 15 sala 801—6O.165—070 -Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

BACKGROUND: Maternal mortality from complications of unsafe abortion constitutes a serious problem in several developing countries. There is, however, a paucity of well-designed and implemented studies in this area, especially in Latin America. The aim of this paper is to present the findings on the determinants and medical characteristics of abortions among women admitted to hospitals.

METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional hospital-based study was carried out between October 1992 and September 1993 in Fortaleza, Brazil. A Cox's proportional hazard model was used to estimate prevalence rate ratios after adjustment for confounding.

RESULTS: Among 2074 (48%) women who admitted to terminating the pregnancy, 66% reported using misoprostol to induce abortion. Women with an induced abortion as compared with those with an unlikely induced abortion are younger, more often not married, have fewer children alive and experienced one or more previous induced abortions. We have not found any important differences with regard to complication or duration of stay in hospital.

CONCLUSIONS: This finding, at odds with most previous studies, could reflect the special situation in Brazil where misoprostol is used for illegally-induced abortion. The use of misoprostol by this population may have contributed to the reduction of severe complications related to induced abortion which were most prevalent with more invasive methods. Recommendations are made as to the need for confirmatory studies as well as on information regarding cultural perceptions and concepts of abortion, and reasons why poor women fail to adopt available family planning methods.

Keywords Induced abortion, reproductive health, misoprostol, odds ratio, prevalence rate ratio, Brazil

Accepted 3 February 1998


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
A. Bernabe-Ortiz MD, P. J. White PhD, C. P. Carcamo MD PhD, J. P. Hughes PhD, M. A. Gonzales, P. J. Garcia MD MPH, G. P. Garnett PhD, and K. K. Holmes MD PhD
Clandestine induced abortion: prevalence, incidence and risk factors among women in a Latin American country
Can. Med. Assoc. J., February 3, 2009; 180(3): 298 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.