Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rachet, B.
Right arrow Articles by Benyaminea, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rachet, B.
Right arrow Articles by Benyaminea, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

research-article

Prognostic factors for mortality in nasopharyngeal cancer: accounting for time-dependence of relative risks

Bernard Racheta, Annie J Sascoa,b,, Michal Abrahamowicza,c and Daniel Benyamineaa

aUnit of Epidemiology for Cancer Prevention, International Agency for Research Cancer 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
bOn secondment from the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) France
cDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, and Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medidne, Montreal General Hospital Montreal Quebec Canada

Reprint requests: Dr Annie J Sasco, Unit of Epidemiology for Cancer Prevention, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 Court Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08. France

BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed the role of prognostic factors for mortality from nasopharyngeal cancer and even fewer used multivariable methods. Most of these studies relied on the Cox model without testing the proportional hazards assumption.

METHODS: A cohort of 76 cases of nasopharyngeal cancer recorded in the Rhône, France, between 1980 and 1985, was followed until 1995. Proportional hazards assumption was tested for each putative prognostic factor. Two multivariable models were built using forward selection of prognostic factors: the Cox model and a flexible model in which variables not meeting the proportional hazards assumption were represented by a time-varying hazard ratio.

RESULTS: Only Epstein Barr Virus Nuclear Antigen (EBNA) serology, a marker of infection by the Epstein-Barr virus, and tumoral extent were selected in the analysis based on the Cox model. In contrast, four prognostic factors were significant at {alpha}=0.05 level in the flexible model: initial EBNA serology, tumoral histology, age and tumoral extent, the last two not verifying the proportional hazards assumption. The relative risk of age increases with duration of follow-up whereas the effect of tumoral extent changes in a non-monotonic pattern.

CONCLUSION: We showed the importance of taking into account the non-proportionality of hazards which can influence results and yield new insights about the role of prognostic factors in nasopharyngeal cancer. Because of the small size of our cohort, our results have to be confirmed in an independent study.

Keywords Nasopharyngeal neoplasm, prognostic factors, proportional hazards tests, parental occupation, Epstein-Barr Virus serology

Accepted 17 March 1998


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.