Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ronsmans, C.
Right arrow Articles by Van Ginneken, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ronsmans, C.
Right arrow Articles by Van Ginneken, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

research-article

A comparison of three verbal autopsy methods to ascertain levels and causes of maternal deaths in Matlab, Bangladesh

Carine Ronsmansa,, Anne Marie Vannesteb, Jyotshamoy Chakrabortyb and Jeroen Van Ginnekenb

aMaternal and Child Epidemiology Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, currently at the Epidemiology Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antsserp
bInternational Centre for Diarrhoral Diseases Research Bangladesh

Reprint requests Canne Ronsmans, Epidemiology Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, institute of Tropical Medicine, 155 Naiionalestraat, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium

BACKGROUND: Verbal autopsies have been widely used to determine the levels and causes of maternal death but few studies have assessed the reliability of various methods.

METHODS: We compared the levels and causes of maternal mortality in three data sources from Matlab, Bangladesh: (1) maternal deaths identified through a unique demographic surveillance system (DSS); (2) maternal deaths identified as a result of a previous detailed investigation into the levels and causes of maternal mortality; and (3) maternal deaths identified in the current special study. All studies used lay reporting, but differed in terms of the nature of the study, the sex of the interviewer, the format of the questionnaire and the procedure to derive the diagnosis.

RESULTS: There were substantial disagreements between the routine reporting and the special studies. The DSS identified 67.2% of all deaths occurring during pregnancy or within 42 days postpartum (82.3% of direct obstetric deaths, 70.0% of deaths due to induced abortions and 42.4% of indirect obstetric deaths). Extending the definition of maternal deaths to 90 days postpartum increased the numbers of maternal deaths between 1987 and 1993 from 174 to 196. The two special studies also disagreed in the ascertainment of the causes of maternal deaths and yielded different cause of death distributions; the proportion of direct obstetric deaths (excluding abortion) was 50.4% in the current system compared to 44.5% previously (P= 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the known difficulties in the ascertainment of the levels and causes of maternal mortality. The large disparities in the levels and causes of maternal mortality using three different methods of lay reporting in a population with an almost complete vital registration system add to the growing concern about the inaccuracies in the measurement of maternal mortality.

Keywords Maternal mortality, ascertainment, verbal autopsy

Accepted 5 November 1997


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
S. Abdullah, K. Adazu, H. Masanja, D. Diallo, A. Hodgson, E. Ilboudo-Sanogo, A. Nhacolo, S. Owusu-Agyei, R. Thompson, T. Smith, et al.
Patterns of Age-Specific Mortality in Children in Endemic Areas of Sub-Saharan Africa
Am J Trop Med Hyg, December 1, 2007; 77(6_Suppl): 99 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
V. Gajalakshmi and R. Peto
Commentary: Verbal autopsy procedure for adult deaths.
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 35(3): 748 - 750.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G. Yang, C. Rao, J. Ma, L. Wang, X. Wan, G. Dubrovsky, and A. D Lopez
Validation of verbal autopsy procedures for adult deaths in China
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 35(3): 741 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
Dao Lan Huong, Hoang Van Minh, and P. Byass
Applying verbal autopsy to determine cause of death in rural Vietnam
Scand J Public Health, December 1, 2003; 31(6_suppl): 19 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
Dao Lan Huong, Hoang Van Minh, and P. Byass
Applying verbal autopsy to determine cause of death in rural Vietnam
Scand J Public Health, January 1, 2003; 31(62_suppl): 19 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
C Ronsmans, M Khlat, B Kodio, M Ba, L De Bernis, and J. Etard
Evidence for a 'healthy pregnant woman effect' in Niakhar, Senegal?
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2001; 30(3): 467 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
R. Wurthwein, A. Gbangou, R. Sauerborn, and C. M Schmidt
Measuring the local burden of disease. A study of years of life lost in sub-Saharan Africa
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2001; 30(3): 501 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
K. P West Jr, J. Katz, S. K Khatry, S. C LeClerq, E. K Pradhan, S. R Shrestha, P. B Connor, S. M Dali, P. Christian, R. P Pokhrel, et al.
Double blind, cluster randomised trial of low dose supplementation with vitamin A or beta  carotene on mortality related to pregnancy in Nepal
BMJ, February 27, 1999; 318(7183): 570 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.