Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dummer, T.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dummer, T.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

research-article

Stillbirth rates around the nuclear installation at Sellafield, North West England: 1950–1989

TJB Dummera, HO Dickinsona, MS Pearcea, ME Charltonb, J Smitha, J Salottia and L Parkera

aNorth of England Children's Cancer Research Unit. Department of Child Health. University of Newcastle upon Tyne Royal Victona Infimay. Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NEI 4LP. UK
bDepartment of Geography, University of Newcastle upon Tyne Daysh Building, Newcastle upon Tyne NEI 7RU. UK

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate whether proximity to the nuclear installation at Sellafield, in Cumbria, North West of England. increases the risk of stillbirth in the resident population. The cohort consisted of all 256 066 live and 4034 stillbirths to mothers usually domiciled in Cumbria, 1950–1989.

METHODS: The study was a retrospective cohort analysis allowing for year of birth, social class and birth order using: (i) Poisson probability mapping. (ii) comparison of cumulative observed and expected numbers of stillbirths by distance from Sellafield, (iii) logistic regression of stillbirth risk in relation to distance and direction from Sellafield.

RESULTS: Poisson probability mapping of stillbirths within 25 km of Sellafield provided no evidence to suggest that proximity to Sellafield increased the risk of stillbirth, either overall or in any specific direction. Comparison ol the cumulative observed and expected numbers of stillbirths also showed no increased risk with proximity to Sellafield. Logistic regression analysis of all Cumbrian births supported these results, showing, in particular, that distance from Sellafield did not significantly influence stillbirth risk (P = 0.30). Although there was significant variation in stillbirth risk with direction (P = 0.0004), this was due to stillbirths in areas much further than 25 km from Sellafield. There was no significant effect with distance from Sellafield within any of six directional sectors (P> 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence to suggest that proximity to Sellafield increases the risk of stillbirth in the resident population.

Keywords Stillbirths, environmental radiation, cohort study

Accepted 4 April 1997


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
R Slama, O Boutou, B Ducot, and A Spira
Reproductive life events in the population living in the vicinity of a nuclear waste reprocessing plant
J Epidemiol Community Health, June 1, 2008; 62(6): 513 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
L. Parker, H. O Dickinson, and T. Morton-Jones
Proximity to maternity services and stillbirth risk
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., March 1, 2000; 82(2): 167F - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.