Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ekow, E. E
Right arrow Articles by Moawad, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ekow, E. E
Right arrow Articles by Moawad, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

research-article

The relationship of interpregnancy interval to the risk of preterm births to black and white women

Edem E Ekowa and Atef Moawadb

aSection of Chronic Disease and Department of Pediatrics, La Rabida Children's Hospital and Research Center E 65th St and Lake Michigan, Chicago, IL 60649. USA
bSection of Maternal and Fetal Medidne, The Deparunent of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of the Biological Sciences. Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago Chicago, IL USA

BACKGROUND: Premature births are of major public health concern. Short interpregnancy intervals may influence the incidence of premature births among black and white women, with blacks conceiving at shorter intervals than whites.

DESIGN: Women (293 blacks and 468 whites) with complete obstetric records delivering singleton infants between January 1988 and December 1993 were included. We related the outcome of the second of any pair of consecutive pregnancies to the interval between the pair.

RESULTS: Both black and white women conceiving within 3 months or less of their preceding pregnancy had a high risk of premature birth (37.5%). At all other intervals, the risk among blacks was consistently over twice that for whites. Conception within an interval of 6 months or less was significantly associated with increased risk of premature birth for blacks (35.8% versus 25.8% for longer intervals; P = 0.03), but this difference was not significant after controlling for other confounding variables (odds ratio = 1.52, 95= confidence interval [CI] : 0.91–2.55). Whites conceiving within 6 months compared to those conceiving after more than 6 months had no significant increased risk (18.4% versus 9.7%). The risk preterm birth was 1.67 (CI :0.42–2.91) for women conceiving at 6 months, compared to those who conceived after 6 months, after controlling for confounding variables.

CONCLUSIONS: Preterm birth was not significantly associated with short intervals of 6 months or less for both black and white women. A subset of multiparous black women with short interpregnancy intervals, however, may have an increased risk of premature birth.

Keywords prematurity, interpregnancy interval

Accepted 1 April 1997


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. Conde-Agudelo, A. Rosas-Bermudez, and A. C. Kafury-Goeta
Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis.
JAMA, April 19, 2006; 295(15): 1809 - 1823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
T.-T. Hsieh, S.-F. Chen, W.-Y. Shau, C.-C. Hsieh, J.-J. Hsu, and T.-H. Hung
The Impact of Interpregnancy Interval and Previous Preterm Birth on the Subsequent Risk of Preterm Birth
Reproductive Sciences, April 1, 2005; 12(3): 202 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
L. J. Akinbami, K. C. Schoendorf, and J. L. Kiely
Risk of Preterm Birth in Multiparous Teenagers
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, November 1, 2000; 154(11): 1101 - 1107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.