Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 26, S110-S117, Copyright © 1997 by International Epidemiological Association


ARTICLES

Relative validity and reproducibility of a diet history questionnaire in Spain. III. Biochemical markers. EPIC Group of Spain. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition


BACKGROUND: A dietary history questionnaire (DH) administered by interview was validated against 12 24-hour recalls. Relative validity of the DH and the 24-hour diet recalls was assessed by comparing nutrient intake derived from both methods with the urinary excretion of nitrogen (N) and plasma levels of carotenes, vitamin E and vitamin C. METHODS: The urinary excretion of N was estimated from four 24-hour urine collections of 64 subjects (30 males and 34 females), and plasma levels of carotenes and vitamins C and E from one fasting blood collection in 72 subjects (32 men and 40 women). RESULTS: The mean difference (g/day) between N excretion and N intake was -0.73 (-3.1%) for the DH and -1.4 (-8.2%) for the 24-hour diet recalls. The Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.58 and 0.52 respectively. The crude Pearson correlation coefficient between plasma level of vitamin C and dietary intake according to the DH was 0.46 and according to the 24- hour diet recall was 0.49. For beta-carotene it was 0.33 and 0.42 and for total carotenoids it was 0.27 and 0.28. For vitamin E, after adjusting for cholesterol levels and energy intake, it was 0.33 and 0.36. Some differences were found by gender and smoking habit. CONCLUSIONS: The DH method gives similar results to those from the 24- hour diet recall that was used as the dietary reference method which demonstrated that DH can provide a relatively valid measurement of habitual intake for the studied nutrients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. B. Dixon, A. F. Subar, L. Wideroff, F. E. Thompson, L. L. Kahle, and N. Potischman
Carotenoid and Tocopherol Estimates from the NCI Diet History Questionnaire Are Valid Compared with Multiple Recalls and Serum Biomarkers
J. Nutr., December 1, 2006; 136(12): 3054 - 3061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
N. M McKeown, N. E Day, A. A Welch, S. A Runswick, R. N Luben, A. A Mulligan, A. McTaggart, and S. A Bingham
Use of biological markers to validate self-reported dietary intake in a random sample of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer United Kingdom Norfolk cohort
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2001; 74(2): 188 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
K. Resnicow, E. Odom, T. Wang, W. N. Dudley, D. Mitchell, R. Vaughan, A. Jackson, and T. Baranowski
Validation of Three Food Frequency Questionnaires and 24-Hour Recalls with Serum Carotenoid Levels in a Sample of African-American Adults
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2000; 152(11): 1072 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M-J Tormo, C Navarro, M D Chirlaque, X Barber, and the EPIC Group of Spain
Validation of self diagnosis of high blood pressure in a sample of the Spanish EPIC cohort: overall agreement and predictive values
J Epidemiol Community Health, March 1, 2000; 54(3): 221 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.