Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maude, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maude, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 26, 1097-1106, Copyright © 1997 by International Epidemiological Association


ARTICLES

The effect of different sensitivity, specificity and cause-specific mortality fractions on the estimation of differences in cause-specific mortality rates in children from studies using verbal autopsies

GH Maude and DA Ross
Tropical Health Epidemiology Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.

BACKGROUND: Verbal autopsies (VA) are increasingly being used in developing countries to determine causes of death, but little attention is generally given to the misclassification effects of the VA. This paper considers the effect of misclassification on the estimation of differences in cause-specific mortality rates between two populations. METHODS: The bias in the percentage difference in cause-specific mortality between two populations has been explored under two different models: i) assuming that mortality from all other causes does not differ between the two populations; ii) allowing for a difference in mortality from all other causes. The bias is described in terms of the sensitivity and specificity of the VA diagnosis and the proportion of mortality due to the cause of interest. Methods for adjustment of sample size and adjusting the estimate of effect are also explored. RESULTS: The results are illustrated for a range of plausible values for these parameters. The bias is more extreme as both sensitivity and specificity fall, and is particularly affected even by a small loss of specificity. The bias also increases as the proportion of all deaths due to the cause of interest decreases, and is affected by the size of the true change in mortality due to the cause of interest relative to the change in mortality from other causes. Calculations from existing data suggest prohibitively large sample sizes may often be required to detect important differences in cause-specific mortality rates in studies using existing VA. CONCLUSIONS: Highly specific VA tools are needed before observed differences in cause-specific mortality can be interpreted. Loss of power due to misclassification may obscure real differences in cause-specific mortality.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. M Edmond, B. R Kirkwood, S. Amenga-Etego, S. Owusu-Agyei, and L. S Hurt
Effect of early infant feeding practices on infection-specific neonatal mortality: an investigation of the causal links with observational data from rural Ghana
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2007; 86(4): 1126 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.