Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Limburg, H
Right arrow Articles by Sundaram, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Limburg, H
Right arrow Articles by Sundaram, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 26, 1049-1054, Copyright © 1997 by International Epidemiological Association


ARTICLES

Rapid assessment of prevalence of cataract blindness at district level

H Limburg, R Kumar, A Indrayan and KR Sundaram
Division of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.

AIM: To find an optimal cluster size and number of clusters for a reasonable estimate of the prevalence of cataract blindness in people aged > or = 50 years in 19 rural districts of a state in India. MATERIALS: Cluster sampling methodology was used in 19 rural districts of Karnataka State, India. In each district, 15 clusters were randomly selected and 90 people aged > or = 50 years were examined in each cluster. As a result the visual acuity and lens status of a total of 22,218 people were assessed. METHODS: For each district, the design effect for cluster size ranging from 20 to 90 was calculated and the optimal cluster size and the required number of clusters to achieve an accuracy of 1% errors and 80% confidence was assessed. RESULTS: The age and gender adjusted prevalence of cataract blindness varied from 1.58% to 7.24%, which justifies district level surveys. The design effect is nearly 1.5 for clusters of sizes 30 and 40. With an average prevalence of 4.93% with 1% error and 80% confidence level, the optimal number of clusters is 37 and 28 for a cluster size of 30 and 40 respectively and the average sample size for a district around 1100. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid assessments for cataract blindness in those aged > or = 50 years can be conducted at district level in India with existing resources and at affordable costs. These provide reliable data, essential for effective monitoring and planning. Other parameters, for instance, surgical coverage can also be assessed. The availability of standardized software for data entry and analysis and strict adherence to survey procedures is essential.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
J. E. Oye and H. Kuper
Prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in Limbe urban area, South West Province, Cameroon
Br J Ophthalmol, November 1, 2007; 91(11): 1435 - 1439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
J. Ramke, A. Palagyi, T. Naduvilath, R. du Toit, and G. Brian
Prevalence and causes of blindness and low vision in Timor-Leste
Br J Ophthalmol, September 1, 2007; 91(9): 1117 - 1121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
R. R A Bourne
Uncorrected refractive error and presbyopia: accommodating the unmet need
Br J Ophthalmol, July 1, 2007; 91(7): 848 - 850.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
Z Wadud, H Kuper, S Polack, R Lindfield, M R Akm, K A Choudhury, T Lindfield, H Limburg, and A Foster
Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness and needs assessment of cataract surgical services in Satkhira District, Bangladesh
Br J Ophthalmol, October 1, 2006; 90(10): 1225 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
K M Anjum, M B Qureshi, M A Khan, N Jan, A Ali, K Ahmad, and M D Khan
Cataract blindness and visual outcome of cataract surgery in a tribal area in Pakistan
Br J Ophthalmol, February 1, 2006; 90(2): 135 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
G V. S Murthy, S K Gupta, D Bachani, R Jose, and N John
Current estimates of blindness in India
Br J Ophthalmol, March 1, 2005; 89(3): 257 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
S Amansakhatov, Z P Volokhovskaya, A N Afanasyeva, and H Limburg
Cataract blindness in Turkmenistan: results of a national survey
Br J Ophthalmol, November 1, 2002; 86(11): 1207 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
R. Kumar and A. Indrayan
A nomogram for single-stage cluster-sample surveys in a community for estimation of a prevalence rate
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2002; 31(2): 463 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
M. M Rabiu
Cataract blindness and barriers to uptake of cataract surgery in a rural community of northern Nigeria
Br J Ophthalmol, July 1, 2001; 85(7): 776 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.