International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 26, 635-642, Copyright © 1997 by International Epidemiological Association
G Benke, M Sim, A Forbes and M Salzberg
BACKGROUND: Occupational hygiene panels are increasingly being used to rate
retrospective occupational exposures to chemicals in community- based
studies. This study aimed to assess the validity, reliability and
feasibility of using such an expert panel in a brain tumour case- control
study. METHODS: A panel of five experts was recruited to rate exposure to
21 chemicals for 298 job descriptions to investigate the level of
agreement. Validity was assessed by comparing the ratings of the experts
for 49 of the jobs with objective quantitative exposure data which existed
for these jobs. Repeatability was assessed by comparing the results for 50
resubmissions. RESULTS: Specificity was high for reporting that exposure
occurred (all above 90%), but sensitivity was variable with values between
48% and 79%. Weaker validity was found for rating exposure level and
exposure frequency. The raters showed the greatest inter-rater agreement
for exposure to three of the 21 chemicals considered (kappa = 0.64 for
cutting fluids, kappa = 0.57 for welding fumes and kappa = 0.42 for
lubricating oils). Intra-rater reliability, based on the 50 resubmitted
jobs, was fair to good (kappa = 0.46, 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: The potential
effect of exposure misclassification from using expert panels was
quantified and found to be a significant source of bias. The optimum
situation occurred where three of the five raters concurred, where an odds
ratio of 2.2 was observed for a true odds ratio of 4.0. Future studies
which plan to use expert panels should screen the experts for their
suitability by validating their performance against jobs with known
exposure data.
ARTICLES
Retrospective assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals in community-based studies: validity and repeatability of industrial hygiene panel ratings
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P J Quinlan, G Earnest, M D Eisner, E H Yelin, P P Katz, J R Balmes, and P D Blanc Performance of self-reported occupational exposure compared to a job-exposure matrix approach in asthma and chronic rhinitis Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2009; 66(3): 154 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. A. McKinney, O. Y. Raji, M. van Tongeren, and R. G. Feltbower The UK Childhood Cancer Study: maternal occupational exposures and childhood leukaemia and lymphoma Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2008; 132(2): 232 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. A. Seel, D. D. Zaebst, M. J. Hein, J. Liu, S. J. Nowlin, and P. Chen Inter-Rater Agreement for a Retrospective Exposure Assessment of Asbestos, Chromium, Nickel and Welding Fumes in a Study of Lung Cancer and Ionizing Radiation Ann. Hyg., October 1, 2007; 51(7): 601 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Steinsvag, M. Bratveit, B. E Moen, and H. Kromhout Inter-rater agreement in the assessment of exposure to carcinogens in the offshore petroleum industry Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2007; 64(9): 582 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. C Glass and M. R Sim The challenges of exposure assessment in health studies of Gulf War veterans Phil Trans R Soc B, April 29, 2006; 361(1468): 627 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. van Wijngaarden, P. A. Stewart, A. F. Olshan, D. A. Savitz, and G. R. Bunin Parental Occupational Exposure to Pesticides and Childhood Brain Cancer Am. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2003; 157(11): 989 - 997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Shaw, V. Nelson, D. M. Iovannisci, R. H. Finnell, and E. J. Lammer Maternal Occupational Chemical Exposures and Biotransformation Genotypes as Risk Factors for Selected Congenital Anomalies Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2003; 157(6): 475 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G M Calvert, F L Rice, J M Boiano, J W Sheehy, and W T Sanderson Occupational silica exposure and risk of various diseases: an analysis using death certificates from 27 states of the United States Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2003; 60(2): 122 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. TINNERBERG, P. HEIKKILA, A. HUICI-MONTAGUD, F. BERNAL, A. FORNI, S. WANDERS, H. WELINDER, P. WILHARDT, U. STROMBERG, H. NORPPA, et al. Retrospective Exposure Assessment and Quality Control in an International Multi-centre Case-Control Study Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2003; 47(1): 37 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. BURSTYN and H. KROMHOUT Who Qualifies to be an Expert? Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2003; 47(1): 89 - 89. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Vrijheid, H Dolk, B Armstrong, G Boschi, A Busby, T Jorgensen, and P Pointer Hazard potential ranking of hazardous waste landfill sites and risk of congenital anomalies Occup. Environ. Med., November 1, 2002; 59(11): 768 - 776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K Teschke, A F Olshan, J L Daniels, A J De Roos, C G Parks, M Schulz, T L Vaughan, and H Kromhout Occupational exposure assessment in case-control studies: opportunities for improvement Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2002; 59(9): 575 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. S. Bakke, R. Hanoa, and A. Gulsvik Relation of Occupational Exposure to Respiratory Symptoms and Asthma in a General Population Sample: Self-reported versus Interview-based Exposure Data Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2001; 154(5): 477 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M Kennedy, N. Le Moual, D. Choudat, and F. Kauffmann Development of an asthma specific job exposure matrix and its application in the epidemiological study of genetics and environment in asthma (EGEA) Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2000; 57(9): 635 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|