Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suadicani, P
Right arrow Articles by Gyntelberg, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suadicani, P
Right arrow Articles by Gyntelberg, F
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 26, 321-327, Copyright © 1997 by International Epidemiological Association


ARTICLES

Mortality and morbidity of potentially misclassified smokers

P Suadicani, HO Hein and F Gyntelberg
Epidemiological Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.

OBJECTIVE: Misclassification of smokers as non-smokers may bias estimates of the excess morbidity and mortality associated with smoking. The issue has been given little, if any, attention in prospective epidemiological studies. This study examined characteristics of potentially misclassified smokers with respect to mortality, morbidity, and risk factors. METHOD: A prospective study (within The Copenhagen Male Study, Denmark) used serum cotinine as an objective marker of use of tobacco. A serum concentration of 100 ng/ml was regarded as a relevant threshold for active smoking. In all, 3270 males aged 53-74 years who reported their previous and current tobacco habits, including the use of chew tobacco and snuff, were included. Incidence of all causes of mortality (ACM) during 9 years and death due to ischaemic heart disease (IHD) during 8 years of follow-up were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Overall cumulative incidence rates of ACM and IHD were 19.1% and 4.3%, respectively. Of 1405 men who reported being non-tobacco users, i.e. no current smoking and no use of chewing tobacco or snuff, 1377 had levels < 100 ng/ml, 28 men (2%) had levels equal to or above this threshold value and were considered potentially misclassified smokers. They had significantly higher mortality rates, 35.7% versus 14.7%, P < 0.001, than other self-reported non-tobacco users, and a slightly higher prevalence of tobacco-related cancer, and a highly significant higher prevalence of myocardial infarction, P < 0.001. Compared to non-tobacco users with low cotinine, age-adjusted relative risks (95% CI) were 2.4 (1.3-4.5), P < 0.01, for ACM, and 5.3 (95% CI : 2.1-13.4), P < 0.001, for IHD. CONCLUSIONS: Potentially misclassified smokers deviated strongly from other non-smokers with respect to mortality and morbidity. The importance of this reporting bias when estimating the risk associated with active or passive smoking is discussed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
P. N. Lee, B. Forey, and J. S. Fry
Revisiting the Association between Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Lung Cancer Risk: III. Adjustment for the Biasing Effect of Misclassification of Smoking Habits
Indoor and Built Environment, November 1, 2001; 10(6): 384 - 398.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. Shaw, R. Mitchell, and D. Dorling
Time for a smoke? One cigarette reduces your life by 11 minutes
BMJ, January 1, 2000; 320(7226): 53 - 53.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. E LeVois, M. W Layard, P. Lee, R. Dempsey, K W E Denson, M R Law, J K Morris, and N J Wald
Passive smoking and heart disease
BMJ, August 1, 1998; 317(7154): 344 - 344.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.