Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schiff, M
Right arrow Articles by Becker, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schiff, M
Right arrow Articles by Becker, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 26, 249-255, Copyright © 1997 by International Epidemiological Association


ARTICLES

Ethnic differences in uterine corpus cancer incidence and mortality in New Mexico's American Indians, hispanics and non-Hispanic whites

M Schiff, CR Key, FD Gilliland and TM Becker
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque 87131, USA.

BACKGROUND: Although ethnic and radical differences in uterine corpus cancer incidence and mortality have been reported worldwide, few published data have addressed the epidemiology of uterine cancer among US American Indians and Hispanics. METHODS: We reviewed uterine corpus cancer incidence and survival data from New Mexico's population-based cancer registry collected from 1969 to 1992, and examined State vital records data for uterine cancer deaths collected from 1958 to 1992, focusing on ethnic differences in occurrence and outcomes of uterine malignancies. RESULTS: Non-Hispanic white women had age-adjusted incidence rates that were substantially higher (20.8 per 100,000) than rates for Hispanics (10.3) and American Indians (6.0) over the 24-year period. Uterine cancer mortality rates were also higher for non- Hispanic whites and Hispanics than for American Indian women, although mortality rates were substantially lower than incidence rates. Five- year survival for uterine cancer was comparable among all groups for all stages combined (87.3% for non-Hispanic whites, 81.4% for Hispanics, and 84.6% for American Indians). CONCLUSIONS: Our population- based data show ethnic differences in uterine corpus cancer incidence rates for non-Hispanic white women that were double those for Hispanics, and triple those for American Indian women. Ethnic differences in survival were comparable. Aetiologic studies are warranted to investigate the dramatic ethnic differences in occurrence of uterine cancer.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
V. W. Setiawan, M. C. Pike, L. N. Kolonel, A. M. Nomura, M. T. Goodman, and B. E. Henderson
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Endometrial Cancer Risk: The Multiethnic Cohort Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2007; 165(3): 262 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
B. V.R. Murthy, D. A. Molony, and A. G. Stack
Survival Advantage of Hispanic Patients Initiating Dialysis in the United States Is Modified by Race
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2005; 16(3): 782 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
D. L. Frankenfield, M. V. Rocco, S. H. Roman, and W. M. McClellan
Survival Advantage for Adult Hispanic Hemodialysis Patients? Findings from the End-Stage Renal Disease Clinical Performance Measures Project
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2003; 14(1): 180 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.