Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by AYLWARD, R B.
Right arrow Articles by HASSAN, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by AYLWARD, R B.
Right arrow Articles by HASSAN, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

The Role of Surveillance in a ‘High Risk’ Approach to the Elimination of Neonatal Tetanus in Egypt

R BRUCE AYLWARD*,**, ESMAT MANSOUR**, EL SAID ALY OON{dagger}, SOHAIR AHMED EZZAT TAWFIK{dagger}, SALWA MAKAR**, ABDULLA ABU EL KHEIR** and ATEF HASSAN**

**Child Survial Project Ministry of Health, Cairo, Egypt
{dagger}Department of Communicable Disease Control Ministry of Health, Cairo, Egypt

Aylward R B (Child Survival Project, Ministry of Health, Cairo, Egypt), Mansour E, Oon E S A, Tawfik S A E, Makar S, El Kheir A A and Hassan A. The role of surveillance in a ‘high risk ’ approach to the elimination of neonatal tetanus in Egypt. International Journal of Epidemiology 1996; 25: 1286–1291.

BACKGROUND: Despite an international resolution to eliminate neonatal tetanus (NT) as a public health problem by the year 1995, 490 000 cases occurred worldwide in 1994. An analysis of the NT elimination programme in Egypt was conducted to determine the utility of a ‘high risk’ approach in controlling this disease.

METHODS: Three of the indicators for identifying districts at high risk of NT were evaluated: previous NT rates, tetanus toxoid coverage (TT2+), and urban or rural status. The reduction in NT incidence from 1992 to 1994 was compared between those high risk districts (≥1 NT case/1000 live births in 1992) which did or did not conduct supplementary immunization (P = 0.035).

RESULTS: In a multivariate analysis, the strongest indicator of the NT risk in a district was the presence of ≥1 case/1000 live births in the previous year (Rate ratios [RR] = 3.34 in 1993 and 3.07 in 1994, P < 0.001). The TT2+ coverage was not a reliable indicator of NT risk. Urban areas had a significantly lower risk than rural areas (RR = 0.62 in 1993 and 0.49 in 1994, P < 0.001). The decline in NT rates was greatest in the ‘high risk’ districts that conducted supplementary immunization in both 1993 and 1994.

CONCLUSIONS: Although tetanus toxoid immunization of pregnant women will protect newborns from NT, TT2+ coverage calculated by the administrative method may not reflect a population's risk of NT. Surveillance data, however, can be used to identify areas where the ongoing risk of NT is high. Conducting supplementary immunization in areas that are identified as ‘high risk’ on the basis of previous NT rates can significantly reduce the number of cases in subsequent years.

Keywords neonatal tetanus, elimination, immunization, surveillance, high risk approach

Revised 1 April 1996


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.