Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PLADEVALL, M
Right arrow Articles by LABARTHE, D R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PLADEVALL, M
Right arrow Articles by LABARTHE, D R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

An Assessment of the Validity of ICD Code 410 to Identify Hospital Admissions for Myocardial infarction: The Corpus Christi Heart Project

M PLADEVALL*,**, D C GOFF*, M Z NICHAMAN*, F CHAN*, D RAMSEY*, C ORTIZ* and D R LABARTHE*

*The University of Texes-Houston School of Public Health E-607 RAS, Houston, Texas 77225, USA.

Pladevall M (The University of Texas-Houston School of Public Health, E-607 RAS, Houston, Texas 77225, USA), Goff D C, Nichaman M Z, Chan F, Ramsey D, Ortiz C and Labarthe D R. An assessment of the validity of ICD Code 410 to identify hospital admissions for myocardial infarction: The Corpus Christi Heart Project. International Journal of Epidemiology 1996; 25: 948–952.

BACKGROUND: The identification of myocardial infarction (MI) is typically based on finding events designated by a nosologist with the appropriate international Classification of Diseases (ICD) code, currently code 410. These codes are applied based on review of medical records or death certificates. However, other factors, including reimbursement considerations, may influence the coding process, especially for hospitalizations. Thus, the validity of using ICD code 410 to identify MI must be assessed

METHODS: The Corpus Christi Heart Project (CCHP) is a population-based surveillance programme for hospitalized MI. Patients were identified using concurrent ascertainment in coronary care units and retrospective review of medical records. Events were validated as definite or possible MI using data regarding chest pain, electrocardiographic changes and cardiac enzymes. The validity of using ICD code 410 to identify cases of MI was assessed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and efficiency of ICD code 410 versus the CCHP ‘gold standard’.

RESULTS: Use of ICD code 410 identified 80.9% (401/496) of definite MI, but only 19.0% (243/1280) of possible MI. Only 12.3% (90/734) of discharges with an ICD 410 code received a ‘no MI’ designation based on the ‘gold standard’. The efficiency of ICD code 410 for identifying MI was 92.0% for definite MI and 77.1% for definite and possible MI.

CONCLUSIONS: The use of ICD code 410 to identify hospitalized cases of MI results in a modestly biased overestimate of the number of definite MI hospitalizations; however, this approach warrants consideration due to the expense of validation procedures.

Keywords surveillance, validity, myocardial infarction, ICD codes, sensitivity, predictive value

Revised 1 March 1996


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
B.-A. Nguyen-Khoa, E. L. Goehring Jr, W. Werther, E. W. Gower, D. V. Do, and J. K. Jones
Hospitalized Cardiovascular Diseases in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Arch Ophthalmol, September 1, 2008; 126(9): 1280 - 1286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
M Weiner, T E Stump, C M Callahan, J N Lewis, and C J McDonald
Pursuing integration of performance measures into electronic medical records: beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist medications
Qual. Saf. Health Care, April 1, 2005; 14(2): 99 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
W. D. Rosamond, L. E. Chambless, P. D. Sorlie, E. M. Bell, S. Weitzman, J. C. Smith, and A. R. Folsom
Trends in the Sensitivity, Positive Predictive Value, False-Positive Rate, and Comparability Ratio of Hospital Discharge Diagnosis Codes for Acute Myocardial Infarction in Four US Communities, 1987-2000
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2004; 160(12): 1137 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. R. Heckbert, C. Kooperberg, M. M. Safford, B. M. Psaty, J. Hsia, A. McTiernan, J. M. Gaziano, W. H. Frishman, and J. D. Curb
Comparison of Self-Report, Hospital Discharge Codes, and Adjudication of Cardiovascular Events in the Women's Health Initiative
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2004; 160(12): 1152 - 1158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
R.J. Sapsford, R.A. Lawrance, M.F. Dorsch, R. Das, B.M. Jackson, C. Morrell, M.B. Robinson, and A.S. Hall
Identifying acute myocardial infarction: effects on treatment and mortality, and implications for National Service Framework audit
QJM, March 1, 2003; 96(3): 203 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. E. Kimmel, A. R. Localio, C. Brensinger, C. Miles, J. Hirshfeld, H. L. Haber, and B. L. Strom
Effects of Coronary Stents on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Broad-Based Clinical Practice
Arch Intern Med, September 25, 2000; 160(17): 2593 - 2599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.