Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TRAUTNER, C.
Right arrow Articles by GIANI, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TRAUTNER, C.
Right arrow Articles by GIANI, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Diabetes as a Predictor of Mortality in a Cohort of Blind Subjects

CHRISTOPH TRAUTNER*, ANDREA ICKS*, BURKHARD HAASTERT*, FRANK PLUM**, MICHAEL BERGER{dagger} and GUIDO GIANI*

*Department of Biometrics and Epidemiology, Diabetes Research Institute at Heinrich Heine University Auf'm Hennekamp 65, 40225 D{diaeresis}sseldorf, Germany.
**Department of Ophthalmology, Krefeld City Hospital, (Teaching Hospital of Heinrich Heine University, D{diaeresis}sseldorf) 47805 Krefeld, Germany.
{dagger}Deparment of Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, (WHO Collaborating Center for Diabetes), Heinrich Heine University 40225 D{diaeresis}usseldorf, Germany.

Trautner C (Department of Biometrics and Epidemiology, Diabetes Research Institute at Heinrlch Heine University, Auf'm Hennekamp 65, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany), Icks A, Haastert B, Plum F, Berger M and Giani G. Diabetes as a predictor of mortality in a cohort of blind subjects.International Journal of Epidemiology 1996; 25: 1038–1043.

BACKGROUND: There is only a little information about survival in newly registered blind subjects.

METHODS: A closed cohort of blind subjects (n =2680, 1803 of them women), newly registered between 1990 and 1993 in the district of Württemberg-Hohenzollern, Germany, was observed for up to 48 months. Mortality was compared to that of the general population. Predictors of mortality within that cohort were identified by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS: Before 1 February 1994, 582 of the subjects had died. Diabetes had been diagnosed in 772 of the subjects, 226 of them died. The overall incidence rate of death was 12 179 per 100 000 per year. The probability of survival after 47 months was 0.64 (95% confidence interval (Cl) : 0.59–0.70) In the non-diabetic, and 0.48 (95% Cl : 0.37–0.55) in the diabetic subjects. Predictors of mortality in the regression model were age (risk ratio [RR] per year of age 1.047), sex (RR for men 1.247) and diabetes (RR when blindness was unrelated to diabetes: 1.448, RR when diabetes was the only cause of blindness: 2.253). Compared with the entire population, mortality was considerably increased in the blind cohort (comparative mortality figure [CMF] 4.79), particularly in individuals with diabetes (CMF = 6.55) The relative risks decreased wtth Increasing age.

CONCLUSIONS: Overall mortality in this cohort was high, even higher than in previous studies on the mortality of the blind. Diabetes increased the risk of death. In addition, the cause of blindness in diabetic individuals was a major predictor of mortality.

Keywords blindness, comparative mortality figure, Cox proportional hazards regression, diabetes, mortality, population-based register, standardized mortality ratio, survival analysis

Revised 1 March 1996


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. Trautner, B. Haastert, B. Richter, M. Berger, and G. Giani
Incidence of Blindness in Southern Germany Due to Glaucoma and Degenerative Conditions
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2003; 44(3): 1031 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.