Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by QUICK, R. E
Right arrow Articles by TAUXE, R. V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by QUICK, R. E
Right arrow Articles by TAUXE, R. V
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Using a Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Survey to Supplement Findings of an Outbreak Investigation: Cholera Prevention Measures during the 1991 Epidemic in Peru

ROBERT E QUICK*, MICHAEL L GERBER**, ANA MARIA PALACIOS{dagger}, LUIS BEINGOLEA{dagger}, RODOLFO VARGAS{dagger}, OSCAR MUJICA{dagger}, DAFNE MORENO{dagger}, LUIS SEMINARIO{dagger}, ELEANOR B SMITHWICK{ddagger} and ROBERT V TAUXE*

*Foodborne and Diarrheal Diseases Branch, Division of Bactenal and Mycotic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA 30333, USA.
**Emory University. School of Public Health, Atlanta GA, USA.
{dagger}Program de Epidemiologia del Campo, Ministerio de Salud, Lima Peru.
{ddagger}Peruvian Amazon Conservation, Inc., Atlanta GA, USA.

BACKGROUND: To assess the effectiveness of the cholera prevention activities of the Peruvian Ministry of Health, we conducted a knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) survey in urban and rural Amazon communities during the cholera epidemic in 1991.

METHODS: We surveyed heads of 67 urban and 61 rural households to determine diarrhoea rates, sources of cholera prevention information, and knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding ten cholera prevention measures.

RESULTS: Twenty-five per cent of 482 urban and 11% of 454 rural household members had diarrhoea during the first 3–4 months of the epidemic. Exposure to mass media education was greater in urban areas, and education through interpersonal communication was more prevalent in rural villages. Ninety-three per cent of rural and 67% of urban respondents believed they could prevent cholera. The mean numbers of correct responses to ten knowledge questions were 7.8 for urban and 8.2 for rural respondents. Practices lagged behind knowledge and attitudes (mean correct response to ten possible: urban 4.9, rural 4.6). Seventy-five per cent of respondents drank untreated water and 91% ate unwashed produce, both of which were identified as cholera risk factors in a concurrently conducted case-control study.

CONCLUSIONS: The cholera prevention campaign successfully educated respondents, but did not cause many to adopt preventive behaviours. Direct interpersonal education by community-based personnel may enhance the likelihood of translating education into changes In health behaviours. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices surveys conducted with case-control studies during an epidemic can be an effective method of refining education/control programmes.

Keywords cholera, prevention, Amazon, health education, health behaviour, self-efficacy

Revised 1 December 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.