Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MCCAW-BINNS, A. M
Right arrow Articles by IRONS, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MCCAW-BINNS, A. M
Right arrow Articles by IRONS, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Registration of Births, Stillbirths and Infant Deaths in Jamaica

AFFETTE M MCCAW-BINNS*,{dagger},, KRISTIN FOX**,{ddagger}, KAREN E FOSTER-WILLIAMS*, DEANNA E ASHLEY** and BERYL IRONS**

*Department of Child Health, University of the West Indies (UWI) Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica.
**Ministry of Health Jamaica.
{dagger}Currently at the Tropical Metabolism Research Unit, UWI.
{ddagger}Currently at the Institute of Social and Economic Research, UWI.
§Ministry of Health. Report on Under-registration of deaths— Compiled from Data Collected in a House to House Pilot Study Conducted in (the parish of) Clarendon for Assessing the Extent of Under-registration of Vital Events, 1981. (personal communication).

Reprint requests to: Dr Affette McCaw-Binns, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica.

BACKGROUND: Vital statistics underestimate the prevalence of perinatal and infant deaths. This is particularly significant when these parameters affect eligibility for international assistance for newly emerging nations.

METHODS: To determine the level of registration of livebirths, stillbirths and infant deaths in Jamaica.

RESULTS: Births, stillbirths and neonatal deaths identified during a cross-sectional study (1986); and infant deaths identified In six parishes (1993) were matched to vital registration documents filed with the Registrar General.

CONCLUSIONS: While 94% of livebirths were registered by one year of age (1986), only 13% of stillbirths (1986) and 25% of infant deaths (1993) were registered. Post neonatal deaths were more likely to be registered than early neonatal deaths. Frequently the birth was not registered when the Infant died. Birth registration rates were highest in parishes with high rates of hospital deliveries (rs = 0.97, P < 0.001) where institutions notify the registrar of each birth. Hospital deaths, however, were less likely to be registered than community deaths as registrars are not automatically notified of these deaths.

Conclusions. To improve vital registration, institutions should become registration centres for all vital events occurring there (births, stillbirths, deaths). Recommendations aimed at modernizing the vital registration system in Jamaica and other developing countries are also made.

Keywords vital registration, Infant deaths, stillbirths, birth registration, Jamaica

Revised 1 January 1996


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
M. S. Kramer
The Epidemiology of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An Overview
J. Nutr., May 1, 2003; 133(5): 1592S - 1596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.