Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WU, T.-N.
Right arrow Articles by CHANG, P.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WU, T.-N.
Right arrow Articles by CHANG, P.-Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Occupational Lead Exposure and Blood Pressure

TRONG-NENG WU*, CHEN-YANG SHEN**, KQUE-NU KO{dagger}, CHIAM-FANG GUU{ddagger}, HUEY-JIUAN GAU{ddagger}, JIM-SHOUNG LAI{ddagger}, CHEN-JEN CHEN§ and PO-YA CHANG{dagger}

*Disease Surveillance and Quarantine Service, Department of Health, Executive Yuan Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
**Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
{dagger}Department of Health, Executive Yuan Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
{ddagger}Institute of Environmental Medicine, Chinese Medical College Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
§Institute of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Taiwan University Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

BACKGROUND: To assess the relation between occupational lead exposure and elevated blood pressure with consideration of a possible confounding effect by noise exposure.

MATERIALS AND METHOD: Some 112 male and 110 female workers at two lead battery manufacturing factories were recruited for this 1992 study in Taiwan. Study participants received regular physicaJ examinations, including standard measurement of blood pressure, body height/weight. Current occupational exposures to lead and noise were measured by a personal sampling scheme and instruments, and included Individual ambient lead/noise exposure and blood lead level.

RESULTS: Among the 222 battery-factory workers, the average blood lead level was 56.9 ± 25.5 (µg/dl (mean ± standard deviation), the average concentration of ambient lead exposure was 0.190 ± 0.331 mg/m3, average noise exposure was 85.9 ± 5.7 dBA, average systolic blood pressure was 125.2 ± 14.9 mmHg, average diastolic pressure was 80.2 ± 10.9 mmHg, and average mean arterial pressure was 95.2 ± 11.1 mmHg. After considerin g all possible confounding variables, multivariate regression analyses demonstrated that current blood lead level was not a significant predictor for both systolic and diastolic blood pressures in either sex. In the final model, body mass index and years of working in the factory were the only two factors significantly associated with a change in blood pressure. No evidence of an effect of ambient lead exposure or noise exposure on blood pressure were found.

CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that short-term lead exposure, either ambient lead exposure or blood lead level, was not related to blood pressure change among workers who had been exposed at work to occupational lead. These results add to the body of evidence indicating that blood lead exposure does not adversely affect blood pressure.

Keywords lead, blood lead, blood pressure, noise

Revised 1 November 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. Vupputuri, J. He, P. Muntner, L. A. Bazzano, P. K. Whelton, and V. Batuman
Blood Lead Level Is Associated With Elevated Blood Pressure in Blacks
Hypertension, March 1, 2003; 41(3): 463 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
K Nomiyama, H Nomiyama, S-J Liu, Y-X Tao, T Nomiyama, and K Omae
Lead induced increase of blood pressure in female lead workers
Occup. Environ. Med., November 1, 2002; 59(11): 734 - 738.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.