Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KRAVDAL, O.
Right arrow Articles by HANSEN, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KRAVDAL, O.
Right arrow Articles by HANSEN, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

The Importance of Childbearing for Hodgkin's Disease: New Evidence from Incidence and Mortality Models

ØYSTEIN KRAVDAL and SVEIN HANSEN

Cancer Registry, Institute for Epidemiological Cancer Research Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway.

Reprint requests to: Øystein Kravdal, Section for Demography, Department of Economics, University of Oslo PB 1095 Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway.

BACKGROUND: We reported in a recent study that parity was inversely related to the incidence of Hodgkin's disease (HD) in Norwegian women younger than 56. In this study, another data set was used to estimate the parity effects on incidence at higher ages, and two different data sets were used to assess how parity influences prognosis.

METHODS: Multiplicative hazard models were estimated for incidence. A novel approach, based on mixed additive-multiplicative mortality hazard models, was used to assess differences in prognosis. The analysis was based on register and census data.

RESULTS: There was no effect of parity within marriage on HD incidence in women aged 40–80 With respect to prognosis, parity was found to have a beneficial influence in the age group 15–56. Excess mortality among two-child mothers with HD compared to otherwise equal two-child mothers without HD, was significantly lower than the corresponding excess mortality among childless women. However, the same pattern appeared for men. By contrast, there were strong indications of an increase in excess mortality from HD across marital parity for women aged 40–80.

CONCLUSIONS: The results lend support to the view that childbearing confers no long-term protection, but the evidence is far from clear. The physiological processes triggered by pregnancies do not seem to have a beneficial effect on survival. Childbearing before diagnosis may influence prognosis in men as well as women through social or emotional factors, and may also be related to prognosis because of parity-differentials in the general physical constitution. In addition, there is likely to be a positive selection of individuals who want to and are able to have a child after diagnosis.

Keywords Hodgkin's disease, incidence, survival, parity, hazard models, register data

Revised 1 October 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. L. Glaser, C. A. Clarke, R. A. Nugent, C. B. Stearns, and R. F. Dorfman
Reproductive Factors in Hodgkin's Disease in Women
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2003; 158(6): 553 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
O Kravdal
A cancer survival model that takes sociodemographic variations in ""normal"" mortality into account: comparison with other models
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, April 1, 2002; 56(4): 309 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
Y. Yasui, J. D. Potter, J. L. Stanford, M. A. Rossing, M. D. Winget, M. Bronner, and J. Daling
Breast Cancer Risk and "Delayed" Primary Epstein-Barr Virus Infection
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2001; 10(1): 9 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.