Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCHOUTEN, L J
Right arrow Articles by KIEMENEY, L A L M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SCHOUTEN, L J
Right arrow Articles by KIEMENEY, L A L M
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Urban-Rural Differences in Cancer Incidence in The Netherlands, 1989–1991

L J SCHOUTEN*,**,{dagger}, H MEIJER*, J A M HUVENEERS** and L A L M KIEMENEY*,{dagger}

*Department of Epidemiology, University of Nijmegen PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
**Department of Cancer Registration, Comprehensive Cancer Centre IKL Maastricht, The Netherlands.
{dagger}Department of Cancer Registration, Comprehensive Cancer Centre IKO Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Differences in cancer incidence have been observed between urban and rural communities for many decades. These differences have been attributed for the most part to lifestyle aspects. In Western populations, however, differences in lifestyle have diminished. This study addressed the question: For which cancer sites can differences in cancer occurrence still be demonstrated between urban and rural communities in the Netherlands?

METHODS: Cancer incidence data from 1989 to 1991 inclusive, were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Age-adjusted, site-specific incidence rates were calculated for five classes of municipalities classified by address density.

RESULTS: With increasing urbanization, slightly higher incidence rates were observed for all cancer sites combined (rate ratio [RR] = 1.08 in males and 1.12 in females). Statistically significant RR of >1.4 were observed for Kaposi's sarcoma (m), mesothelioma (m), cancer of the liver (m), mouth/pharynx (m + f), oesophagus (f), larynx (f), lung (f), other respiratory organs (f), cervix (f) and Hodgkin's disease (m). Significantly lower incidence rates were found in urban areas for non-melanoma skin (m + f) and lip cancer (m).

CONCLUSIONS: In males, the urban excess of tobacco-related cancer has largely disappeared However, urban-rural differences in cancer incidence still exist for other cancer sites and for tobacco-related cancer in females. Apparently, differences in the prevalence of lifestyle factors are still large enough to cause vanation in cancer incidence.

Keywords cancer incidence, urbanization, the Netherlands

Revised 1 December 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M. Tondel, P. Hjalmarsson, L. Hardell, G. Carlsson, and O. Axelson
Increase of regional total cancer incidence in north Sweden due to the Chernobyl accident?
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, December 1, 2004; 58(12): 1011 - 1016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.