Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SLYMEN, D. J
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMS, S. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SLYMEN, D. J
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMS, S. J
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Determinants of Non-Compliance and Attrition in the Elderly

DONALD J SLYMEN, JOSEPH A DREW, JOHN P ELDER and STEPHEN J WILLIAMS

Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University San Diego. CA 92182, USA.

BACKGROUND: This report identifies demographic and health-related baseline factors associated with non-compliance and attrition in elderly subjects participating in a preventive intervention study over a 4-year follow-up period.

METHODS: The Cox proportional hazards model and polychotomous logistic regression were used to evaluate time to clinic assessment non-compliance and type of non-participation.

RESULTS: Of 1785 subjects, 35.6% were non-compliant during follow-up which meant they were eligible to participate at the time they were contacted but would not or could not return for an assessment. Refusals due to a lack of continuing interest or being too busy, and those citing health problems constituted the major subgroups of non-compliers. Death, unable to contact, and ineligible due to disenrolment or moving away accounted for nearly 20%. Four-year compliance was achieved by 44.4% of the participants. Time to non-compliance was significantly shorter with older age, lower annual Income, poorer personal health ranking, and, to a marginal extent, depression. Lower annual income was associated with all reasons for non-participation including disenrolment or moving. Other factors correlated with specific types of non-participation.

CONCLUSIONS: These results can be useful in designing more effective cohort maintenance strategies. Greater resources may be allocated to subgroups who are less likely to continue.

Keywords non-compliance, attrition, elderly cohort

Revised 1 August 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. Pirzada, L. L. Yan, D. B. Garside, L. Schiffer, A. R. Dyer, and M. L. Daviglus
Response Rates to a Questionnaire 26 Years after Baseline Examination with Minimal Interim Participant Contact and Baseline Differences between Respondents and Nonrespondents
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2004; 159(1): 94 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.