Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'TOOLE, B. I
Right arrow Articles by VENNARD, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'TOOLE, B. I
Right arrow Articles by VENNARD, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

The Australian Vietnam Veterans Health Study: II. Self-Reported Health of Veterans Compared with the Australian Population

BRIAN I O'TOOLE*, RICHARD P MARSHALL**, DAVID A GRAYSON{dagger}, RALPH J SCHURECK{ddagger}, MATTHEW DOBSON§, MARGOT FFRENCH*, BELINDA PULVERTAFT§, LENORE MELDRUM*, JAMES BOLTON** and JULIENNE VENNARD||

* Department of Psychiatry, University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane Hospital Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia.
** Vietnam Veterans Counselling Service, Department of Veterans Affairs
{dagger} Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Sydney Concord Hospital.
{ddagger} Institute of Psychiatric Evaluation Sydney.
§ Department of Community Medicine, University of Sydney Westmead Hospital.
|| Deceased, formerly Department of Community Medicine, University of Sydney Westmead Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Self-reported physical health status of Australian Vietnam veterans was determined 20–25 years after the war and its relation to combat was investigated.

METHOD: An epidemiological cohort study of a simple random sample of Army veterans posted to Vietnam between 1964 and 1972 was conducted with personal interviews using the Australian Bureau of Statistics Health Interview Survey questionnaire to compare veterans with the Australian population and a 21-item combat exposure index used to measure the relationship of combat to physical health

RESULTS: Veterans reported greater health service usage and more recent health actions than population expectations. They also reported excess health problems in almost all recent illness disease categories except endocrine conditions and cardiovascular conditions; only 6 of 37 chronic disease groups were not elevated compared to the population. Adjustment for non-response changed estimates only slightly. Combat exposure was significantly related to reports of recent and chronic mental disorders, recent hernia and chronic ulcer, recent eczema and chronic rash, deafness, chronic infective and parasitic disease, chronic back disorders and symptoms, signs and ill-defined conditions.

CONCLUSIONS: Combat exposure may have significantly increased reports of only some health problems. A general disposition to complain as a result of psychological conditions due to combat is not consistent with the lack of relationship between combat and reports of physical conditions.

Keywords Vietnam veterans, health interviews, combat

Revised 1 October 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
B. I. O'Toole, S. V. Catts, S. Outram, K. R. Pierse, and J. Cockburn
The Physical and Mental Health of Australian Vietnam Veterans 3 Decades After the War and Its Relation to Military Service, Combat, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2009; 170(3): 318 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
Z. Agha, R. P. Lofgren, J. V. VanRuiswyk, and P. M. Layde
Are Patients at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers Sicker?: A Comparative Analysis of Health Status and Medical Resource Use
Arch Intern Med, November 27, 2000; 160(21): 3252 - 3257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.